IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v34yi1-2p11-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer sovereignty: New boundaries for telecommunications and broadband access

Author

Listed:
  • Cherry, Barbara A.

Abstract

Antitrust and consumer protection laws share a common purpose to facilitate the exercise of effective consumer choice. This article uses this concept of consumer sovereignty to frame analysis of the shifting boundaries between the industry-specific and general business legal regimes for telecommunications and broadband access services. A critical distinction in the temporal sequencing of the evolution of the original industry-specific and general business regimes in the US relative to other nations appears to confer institutional differences for developing and implementing deregulatory policies. In the US, issues of consumer sovereignty are being addressed through an uncoordinated stream of piecemeal litigation primarily through interpretation of numerous savings clauses. By contrast, other nations are demonstrating a greater ability or willingness to conduct a holistic review and coordination of consumer protection remedies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cherry, Barbara A., 0. "Consumer sovereignty: New boundaries for telecommunications and broadband access," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-2), pages 11-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:34:y::i:1-2:p:11-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596109001268
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cherry, Barbara A., 2015. "Technology transitions within telecommunications networks: Lessons from U.S. vs. Canadian policy experimentation under federalism," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 463-485.
    2. Cherry, Barbara A., 2014. "Historical mutilation: How misuse of 'public utility and 'natural monopoly' misdirects US telecommunications policy development," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106881, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. de Kervenoael, Ronan & Palmer, Mark & Hallsworth, Alan, 2013. "From the outside in: Consumer anti-choice and policy implications in the mobile gaming market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 439-449.
    4. McDonough, Carol C., 2013. "Consumer demand for fixed and mobile broadband," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88485, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Mwakatumbula, Hilda Jacob & Moshi, Goodiel Charles & Mitomo, Hitoshi, 2019. "Consumer protection in the telecommunication sector: A comparative institutional analysis of five African countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    6. Cherry, Barbara A., 2013. "Policymaking for the PSTN-to-IP transition within federalism: Lessons from US v. Canadian experimentation," 24th European Regional ITS Conference, Florence 2013 88518, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Cherry, Barbara A., 2012. "Continuing erosion of consumer protection remedies for telecommunications services in the U.S," 23rd European Regional ITS Conference, Vienna 2012 60384, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Cherry, Barbara A., 2011. "Legal gaps under deregulatory broadband policies and the resurgent rise of corporate power," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52207, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Cherry, Barbara A., 2011. "Radical experimentation under deregulatory broadband policies: The rise of shadow common carriers," 8th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Taipei 2011: Convergence in the Digital Age 52340, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Cherry, Barbara A., 2021. "The Legal Battle over Telecommunications Service Classification in the U.S.: From Network Neutrality to Voice-Over-Internet Protocol Service," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238015, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:34:y::i:1-2:p:11-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.