IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v25y2001i4p233-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telecommunications liberalisation and the quest for universal service in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • McElhinney, Stephen

Abstract

For at least 20 years privatisation and liberalisation have been championed as forces to lower prices and improve the telecommunication services available to consumers. Yet three years after Australia completed the radical transformation of its telecommunications market and began the privatisation of the former national monopoly carrier, the long cherished egalitarian goal of universal service has become a high-stakes policy contest as industry complains about cost-burdens and people in regional and remote Australia demand improved telecommunications infrastructures. In this environment the policy makers must carefully consider the risks associated with addressing the competing demands of telecommunications companies, new shareholders and key electoral constituencies. This paper uses the Australian universal service obligation in telecommunications to illustrate the unforeseen pitfalls that emerge when the effects of liberalisation threaten to undercut the delivery of a long cherished social objective.

Suggested Citation

  • McElhinney, Stephen, 2001. "Telecommunications liberalisation and the quest for universal service in Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 233-248, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:25:y:2001:i:4:p:233-248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596100000963
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madden, Gary & Coble-Neal, Grant, 0. "Internet use in rural and remote Western Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(3-4), pages 253-266, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:25:y:2001:i:4:p:233-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.