IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v23y1999i7-8p539-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing calls to mobiles: analysis of the UK Monopolies & Mergers Commission Reports on mobile termination charges

Author

Listed:
  • Crocioni, Pietro
  • Veljanovski, Cento

Abstract

The UK Monopolies and Mergers Commission (MMC) nine-month inquiry into fixed-to-mobile termination charges provides an exhaustive analysis of competitive and cost factors in mobile telephony. Its recommendations are discussed and compared with those of the telecommunications regulator, OFTEL, which referred the mobile operators to the MMC after failure to agree a further reduction in charges in early 1998. The MMC, following the same general statutory duty required of OFTEL, to promote competition under the Telecommunications Act 1984, provided a radically different analysis and disagreed with most of OFTEL's specific proposals suggesting that some were anti-competitive. As telecommunications regulators are increasingly required to implement pro-competitive regulation, the MMC's reports show that the evolving approach of sectoral regulators contains some significant flaws.

Suggested Citation

  • Crocioni, Pietro & Veljanovski, Cento, 1999. "Pricing calls to mobiles: analysis of the UK Monopolies & Mergers Commission Reports on mobile termination charges," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(7-8), pages 539-555, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:23:y:1999:i:7-8:p:539-555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596199000385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:23:y:1999:i:7-8:p:539-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.