IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v1y1977i3p230-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teleconferencing: is video valuable or is audio adequate?

Author

Listed:
  • Pye, Roger
  • Williams, Ederyn

Abstract

Many telephone companies and administrations are developing audiovisual teleconference systems; by comparison audiographic systems are receiving attention almost exclusively from user organizations. The authors argue that although teleconferencing has had mixed success, with some installations being used often and judged successful while others are not, the existence of a visual channel showing the participants does not seem necessary. Many other factors likely to contribute to success are identified, which, as yet, have received little attention. It is recommended that they be studied through carefully monitored field trials.

Suggested Citation

  • Pye, Roger & Williams, Ederyn, 1977. "Teleconferencing: is video valuable or is audio adequate?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 1(3), pages 230-241, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:1:y:1977:i:3:p:230-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308596177900271
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:1:y:1977:i:3:p:230-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.