IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v18y1994i9p725-733.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Telecommunications regulation in New Zealand : The court of appeal's decision in Clear Communications v Telecom Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • Blanchard, Carl

Abstract

In December 1992 the High Court of New Zealand ruled in favour of Telecom New Zealand's negotiating strategy with Clear Communications. This article reviews the Court of Appeal's judgment, a judgment which overturned the High Court's acceptance of Telecom's 'Baumol-Willig' pricing model. The Court dismissed the use of the model because it priced access at the opportunity cost of supply -- a price built on perfect market contestability and monopoly profits. This article reviews the judgment and its implications for telecommunications regulation in New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanchard, Carl, 1994. "Telecommunications regulation in New Zealand : The court of appeal's decision in Clear Communications v Telecom Corporation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 725-733, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:18:y:1994:i:9:p:725-733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308596194900264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Svetlana Avdasheva & Dina Tsytsulina, 2014. "Antimonopoly control of tariff regulation: objectives and drawbacks," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 27-46.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:18:y:1994:i:9:p:725-733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.