IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v79y2024ics0160791x2400246x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Ge
  • Chen, Yuche
  • Zheng, Jiali

Abstract

This paper presents a decomposed self-efficacy-based value adoption model (SVAM) to explore user perceptions of partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) and fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs) and their impacts on adoption intention. Data from 279 participants on Mechanical Turk were analyzed using structural equation modeling and multigroup analysis via SmartPLS4.0. Survey results revealed a preference among respondents for PAVs over FAVs. The analysis showed differential effects of perceived value and self-efficacy regarding PAVs and FAVs, shedding light on why users favored PAVs over more advanced FAVs. Perceived enjoyment was identified as a predominant factor in shaping value perceptions of autonomous vehicles, surpassing utilitarian usefulness. Self-efficacy played a varying driving force in preference for PAVs and FAVs, determined by perceived ease of use and familiarity. The proposed SVAM model offers enhanced insights compared to the technology acceptance model in discerning the adoption patterns between PAVs and FAVs. These findings provide valuable insights regarding factors influencing user perceptions and intentions toward PAVs and FAVs, highlighting the different emphases of technology development and marketing in this domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Ge & Chen, Yuche & Zheng, Jiali, 2024. "Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x2400246x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2400246X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x2400246x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.