IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24001295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderating roles of technological innovation and economic complexity in financial development-environmental quality nexus of the BRICS economies

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew, Adewale Alola
  • Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday
  • Lasisi, Taiwo Temitope
  • Muoneke, Obumneke Bob

Abstract

The aspects of globalization are certainly not without economic-related opportunities especially in the developing countries such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). By employing the cross-sectionally augmented autoregressive distributed lag among other empirical approaches over the period 1995–2017, the following critical results are presented by the investigation. Economic complexity, technological innovation, and financial development all yield desirable outlook toward carbon emission mitigation in the countries while economic growth further shows short- and long-run detrimental effect on environmental quality. Moreover, the combined effect of financial development and economic complexity has no significant effect on carbon emission in the short- and long-run while also neutralizing the direct environmental effect of financial development. Additionally, technological innovation moderate financial development to further mitigate carbon emission, thus justifying the direct and indirect environmental effects of technological innovation. Meanwhile, negative environmental effect of economic growth remained unabated in the entire scenario. This result emphasizes the role of environmental-related technologies transfer in improving the bloc's environmental sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew, Adewale Alola & Adebayo, Tomiwa Sunday & Lasisi, Taiwo Temitope & Muoneke, Obumneke Bob, 2024. "Moderating roles of technological innovation and economic complexity in financial development-environmental quality nexus of the BRICS economies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001295
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001295
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anass Hamadelneel Adow, 2024. "Stock Market Development and Environmental Sustainability in Saudi Arabia: Asymmetry Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(5), pages 410-417, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Climate policy; Innovation; Environmental quality; Economic complexity; BRICS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.