IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v46y2016icp70-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-criteria assessment of sanitation technologies in rural Tanzania: Implications for program implementation, health and socio-economic improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Seleman, Amour
  • Bhat, Mahadev G.

Abstract

The wide-spread prevalence of unimproved sanitation technologies around the world has been a major cause of concern for the environment and public health. Public agencies often grapple with the question why the adoption of improved sanitation technologies has been slow. Based on a case study in rural Tanzania, this paper assesses the local environmental conditions and end users’ socio-economic characteristics as drivers of technology diffusion. The assessment relies on a comprehensive framework of sustainability indicators and draws inputs from a survey of 500 households and focus group discussion with 40 environmental health practitioners. Ninety-six percent of the households had toilets, with only 9.4% having improved toilets. Not all recommended technologies were suitable to certain local soil, water and natural resource conditions. The technologies that end users perceived as socio-culturally and economically acceptable were different from those that experts thought to be environmentally and economically sustainable. Lack of education and family economic status drove a wedge between people’s perception and technical prescriptions. On the basis of multi-criteria, aggregate sustainability index, SanPlat and Pour Flush toilets were the top two sustainable technologies. Finally, using a theoretical framework for technology implementation, the paper identifies several existing and potential gaps that may further slowdown the process of technology adoption. Improvement in sanitation in rural Tanzania requires education of people about its health benefits, proper training, and extension of rural health workers. Direct financial incentives could further enhance sanitation practice, hygiene and environmental conditions. The integration of the multi-criteria assessment and implementation framework done in this study should be of interest to other developing countries as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Seleman, Amour & Bhat, Mahadev G., 2016. "Multi-criteria assessment of sanitation technologies in rural Tanzania: Implications for program implementation, health and socio-economic improvements," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:70-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X16300483
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dreze, Jean & Sen, Amartya, 2002. "India: Development and Participation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199257492.
    2. Uddin, Sayed Mohammad Nazim & Muhandiki, Victor S. & Sakai, Akira & Al Mamun, Abdullah & Hridi, Sanjida Marium, 2014. "Socio-cultural acceptance of appropriate technology: Identifying and prioritizing barriers for widespread use of the urine diversion toilets in rural Muslim communities of Bangladesh," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 32-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khalid Massa & Fadhili Kilamile & Emmanuela Safari & Amour Seleman & Anyitike Mwakitalima & Jonas G Balengayabo & Telemu Kassile & Peter E Mangesho & Godfrey M Mubyazi, 2017. "Contributing to the debate on categorising shared sanitation facilities as ‘unimproved’: An account based on field researchers’ observations and householders’ opinions in three regions, Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Thais Thiesen & Mahadev G. Bhat & Hong Liu & Roberto Rovira, 2022. "An Ecosystem Service Approach to Assessing Agro-Ecosystems in Urban Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Kokko, Suvi & Fischer, Klara, 2021. "A practice approach to understanding the multilevel dynamics of sanitation innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angus Deaton & Jean Dreze, 2008. "Nutrition in India: Facts and Interpretations," Working Papers 1071, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies..
    2. Vizard, Polly, 2005. "The contributions of Professor Amartya Sen in the field of human rights," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6273, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Clots-Figueras, Irma, 2011. "Women in politics: Evidence from the Indian States," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 664-690, August.
    4. Lionel Kesztenbaum & Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, 2014. "Income versus Sanitation; Mortality Decline in Paris, 1880-1914," PSE Working Papers halshs-01018594, HAL.
    5. Gulati, Namrata & Ray, Tridip, 2016. "Inequality, neighbourhoods and welfare of the poor," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 214-228.
    6. Cassan, Guilhem, 2019. "Affirmative action, education and gender: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 51-70.
    7. Teresa Bago d'Uva & Maarten Lindeboom & Owen O'Donnell & Eddy van Doorslaer, 2011. "Education‐related inequity in healthcare with heterogeneous reporting of health," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(3), pages 639-664, July.
    8. Prabir C. Bhattacharya, 2006. "Economic Development, Gender Inequality, and Demographic Outcomes: Evidence from India," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 263-292, June.
    9. Gasper, D.R., 2006. "What is the capability approach?: its core, rationale, partners and dangers," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19187, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    10. Cheng, Chao-yo & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2014. "Fuel stacking in India: Changes in the cooking and lighting mix, 1987–2010," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 306-317.
    11. Stephan Klasen & Janneke Pieters, 2015. "What Explains the Stagnation of Female Labor Force Participation in Urban India?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 29(3), pages 449-478.
    12. Ajit K. Dalal, 2010. "Disability–Poverty Nexus," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 22(2), pages 409-437, September.
    13. Negi, Chander Mohan, 2021. "Structural Transformation of Agriculture in Himachal Pradesh," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315389, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Gaël Giraud & Cécile Renouard & Hélène L'Huillier & Raphaële de La Martinière & Camille Sutter, 2012. "Relational Capability: A Multidimensional Approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00827690, HAL.
    15. Josep Colomer & Humberto Llavador, 2012. "An agenda-setting model of electoral competition," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 73-93, March.
    16. Klasen, Stephan & Pieters, Janneke, 2012. "Push or Pull? Drivers of Female Labor Force Participation during India's Economic Boom," IZA Discussion Papers 6395, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Sujarwoto, Sujarwoto & Tampubolon, Gindo, 2016. "Spatial inequality and the Internet divide in Indonesia 2010–2012," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 602-616.
    18. Samb, Oumar Mallé & Ridde, Valery, 2018. "The impact of free healthcare on women's capability: A qualitative study in rural Burkina Faso," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 9-16.
    19. Tumuheki, Peace Buhwamatsiko & Zeelen, Jacques & Openjuru, George Ladaah, 2016. "Towards a conceptual framework for developing capabilities of ‘new’ types of students participating in higher education in Sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 54-62.
    20. Arup Maharatna, 2008. "How can electoral success be sustained by a ‘lagging development’ regime?," Working Papers id:1505, eSocialSciences.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:46:y:2016:i:c:p:70-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.