IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v39y2014icp31-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human spaceflight and presidential agendas: Niche policies and NASA, opportunity and failure

Author

Listed:
  • Handberg, Roger

Abstract

After JFK's assassination in 1963, the Apollo program was virtually guaranteed a run at achieving success although its value was not as high as later mythology suggests. Lyndon Johnson cut the program's budget and vetoed a continuation in the Post Apollo Applications Program, a position ratified by his successor, Richard Nixon. A subsequent attempt by NASA to extend the Apollo program concept to future space exploration was rejected by Nixon. This 1969 decision foreshadowed presidential decisions regarding the human spaceflight program over the past nearly five decades. What makes the relative status of the human spaceflight within presidential agenda interesting and informative is that its importance fluctuates dramatically across time usually due to events outside the realm of space policy. Major changes in either international and/or domestic politics occur and as a result American space policy changes. What appears on the surface as an agency and program insulated from such considerations is in fact one totally subservient to such events. Space policy is only successful in seeking presidential support when it is directly and publicly linked to current presidential priorities; however, those linkages often prove fragile and short lived in part because of NASA's parochial focus and politics. By one count, there have been at least nineteen instances when NASA and its activities came to the president's agenda in a manner requiring a presidential decision. This analysis draws upon the public policy literature dealing with science and technology and the unanticipated outcomes arising within that field. What has not occurred to this point is an explicit analysis of presidential engagement in a framework not driven by presidential personality and short term events but rather one that focuses on space policy as an example of normal politics, meaning presidential engagement in space policy happens only under certain conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Handberg, Roger, 2014. "Human spaceflight and presidential agendas: Niche policies and NASA, opportunity and failure," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 31-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:31-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X14000426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coccia, Mario, 2015. "General sources of general purpose technologies in complex societies: Theory of global leadership-driven innovation, warfare and human development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 199-226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:39:y:2014:i:c:p:31-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.