IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v32y2010i1p31-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Law between the cultures: C.P. Snow's The Two Cultures and the problem of scientific illiteracy in law

Author

Listed:
  • Latham, Stephen R.

Abstract

Fifty years later, C.P. Snow's description of the scientist/humanist divide still sparks debate. Though his book is flawed and in certain respects dated, it remains a heartfelt and intelligent brief for greater scientific literacy and investment, both at home and abroad. The problem of scientific illiteracy is serious, and has serious consequences in the law. In litigation, in legislation, and in the regulatory and enforcement actions of executive agencies, there is pervasive need for scientific expertise to inform legal decisions. But expert testimony in the courtroom or in hearings is a poor substitute for the slow consensus-building process that grounds reliable scientific knowledge. Moreover, the process of borrowing scientific expertise has often been tainted by political or interest-group agendas. For law to make productive use of scientific knowledge, what is required is not scientific understanding, but the humanist's ethical and political commitment to making fair and neutral use of others' expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Latham, Stephen R., 2010. "Law between the cultures: C.P. Snow's The Two Cultures and the problem of scientific illiteracy in law," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 31-34.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:31-34
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.12.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X0900102X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2009.12.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:32:y:2010:i:1:p:31-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.