IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v30y2008i2p154-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social science and technology development: A case study of moving from observation to intervention

Author

Listed:
  • Katz, Evie
  • Solomon, Fiona

Abstract

This paper describes a case study in Australia's national research laboratories, which brought together a technology team and a social research group to understand the context of, and ultimately shape, the development of a coal mining technology. Two theoretical frames, social constructivism and ecological modernisation, orient the discussion about science and technology and the case study experience. The paper summarises the participatory action research approach taken, the structure of participation and interaction, and the form and outcomes of the evaluation. Organisational factors were found to be significant, especially in terms of the perceived place, role of social issues, and research. Overall, the dominance of eco-modernist understandings within the organisation, while open to a technocratic critique, at least represented a partial addressing of sustainable development issues. The case study serves to emphasise the constraints upon choice in technology development.

Suggested Citation

  • Katz, Evie & Solomon, Fiona, 2008. "Social science and technology development: A case study of moving from observation to intervention," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 154-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:30:y:2008:i:2:p:154-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X07000942
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:30:y:2008:i:2:p:154-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.