IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v28y2006i3p321-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic considerations in cooperative research and development agreements (CRADA): The case of Taxol, NIH, and technology transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Hemphill, Thomas A.

Abstract

The General Accounting Office (GAO) of the U.S. Congress released a 2003 report examining the legal and financial issues by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the technology transfer of Taxol, a cancer treatment drug, which was commercialized quickly by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). The GAO concludes that the 1991 cooperative research and development agreement (CRADA) transferring Taxol to the private sector met an NIH primary goal of facilitating the transferring of discoveries to the patients’ bedside: by 2001, Taxol had become the best-selling cancer treatment drug in pharmaceutical history. Nevertheless, criticism of NIH's concern for economic and financial considerations when the agency negotiates CRADAs has generated the following four policy recommendations: (1) recognize reasonable pricing as good corporate citizenship; (2) encourage multiple partner CRADA applications; (3) require lowest federal fee schedule for all government purchases; and (4) calculate a royalty payback fee that covers NIH investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Hemphill, Thomas A., 2006. "Economic considerations in cooperative research and development agreements (CRADA): The case of Taxol, NIH, and technology transfer," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 321-331.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:28:y:2006:i:3:p:321-331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X05000448
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ciccotello, Conrad S. & Fu, Richard & Subramanian, Ajay, 2010. "Commercializing public technology through cooperative R&D," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 108(2), pages 113-115, August.
    2. Huang, Jianan, 2021. "Trends of pharmaceutical corporations’ external innovation strategies: An inverse sigmoid curve," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:28:y:2006:i:3:p:321-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.