IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v27y2005i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

School mathematics in work and life: what we know and how we can learn more

Author

Listed:
  • Gainsburg, Julie

Abstract

Underlying current K-12 math education reform initiatives are two premises. First, math education is necessary and should aim for success in the adult world of work and everyday life. Second, aligning the methods and content of K-12 math programs with those of real-world adult math use will facilitate learning. The existing research, however, challenges these premises. Studies of the actual demands of everyday adult practices reveal that most occupations involve only a low level of mathematical content and expose the disparate natures of everyday and school mathematics. Several limitations of existing mathematics-in-practice research, however, make it problematic to draw clear implications for school programs. In this article, I summarize the current research and identify some of its shortcomings for guiding educational content and pedagogy, including its focus on occupations and practices known to involve little math, its use of stereotypical conceptions of math, and its reliance on surveys and worker self-report. I propose a conceptual framework for future investigations of math-in-practice that would better inform K-12 education.

Suggested Citation

  • Gainsburg, Julie, 2005. "School mathematics in work and life: what we know and how we can learn more," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:27:y:2005:i:1:p:1-22
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.10.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X04000727
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2004.10.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:27:y:2005:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.