IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v80y2013i7p1287-1305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The joint evolution of alliance networks and technology: A survey of the empirical literature

Author

Listed:
  • Stolwijk, C.C.M.
  • Ortt, J.R.
  • den Hartigh, E.

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an overview and assessment of existing empirical literature on the joint evolution of alliance networks and technology. We selected 38 empirical studies that investigate this joint evolution and summarize their results based on the variables they address, representing the composition and structure of the alliance networks and the technology development. We find that most of the results regarding network variables and their effect on technology development are either missing, inconsistent or difficult to compare because of different industry contexts. In most studies, the measurement of technology development – the technology life cycle – is either neglected or not carried out systematically. The more complex structural network variables, such as tie strength, structural holes or structural equivalence, receive little attention. We conclude that the body of knowledge of the joint evolution of alliance network and technology is growing, but not in a systematic way. We identify a clear need for further systematic research into the co-evolutionary aspects of the relationship between alliance networks and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Stolwijk, C.C.M. & Ortt, J.R. & den Hartigh, E., 2013. "The joint evolution of alliance networks and technology: A survey of the empirical literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(7), pages 1287-1305.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:80:y:2013:i:7:p:1287-1305
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162512002983
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou Wen & Chen Wei & Wang Zhanzhao & Ma Yonghong, 2015. "Generating Behavior in the University-Industry Collaboration Network: Based on the Configuration of Motifs," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 3(5), pages 434-450, October.
    2. Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2019. "Trading knowledge for status: Conceptualizing R&D alliance formation to achieve ambidexterity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 36-42.
    3. Gilsing, Victor A. & Cloodt, Myriam & Bertrand–Cloodt, Danielle, 2016. "What makes you more central? Antecedents of changes in betweenness-centrality in technology-based alliance networks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 209-221.
    4. Jacob, Jojo & Duysters, Geert, 2017. "Alliance network configurations and the co-evolution of firms' technology profiles: An analysis of the biopharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 90-102.
    5. Lyu, Yibo & Zhu, Yuqing & Han, Shaojie & He, Binyuan & Bao, Lining, 2020. "Open innovation and innovation "Radicalness"—the moderating effect of network embeddedness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Magistretti, Stefano & Dell'Era, Claudio & Verganti, Roberto, 2020. "Searching for the right application: A technology development review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Johannes Pol & Jean-Paul Rameshkoumar, 2018. "The co-evolution of knowledge and collaboration networks: the role of the technology life-cycle," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(1), pages 307-323, January.
    8. Dong, John Qi & Yang, Chia-Han, 2016. "Being central is a double-edged sword: Knowledge network centrality and new product development in U.S. pharmaceutical industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 113(PB), pages 379-385.
    9. Vermeulen, Ben & De Kok, Ton, 2013. "A value network development model and implications for innovation and production network management," MPRA Paper 51393, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Jing Huang & Hongqi Wang & Jianlong Wu & Zhongji Yang & Xiaobo Hu & Mengmeng Bao, 2020. "Exploring the Key Driving Forces of the Sustainable Intergenerational Evolution of the Industrial Alliance Innovation Ecosystem: Evidence from a Case Study of China’s TDIA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-31, February.
    11. Nihad Faissal Bassis & Fabiano Armellini, 2018. "Systems of innovation and innovation ecosystems: a literature review in search of complementarities," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1053-1080, December.
    12. Johannes VAN DER POL & Jean Paul RAMESHKOUMAR, 2016. "The co-evolution of knowledge and collaboration networks: The role of technology life-cycle in Structural Composite Materials," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2016-25, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:80:y:2013:i:7:p:1287-1305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.