IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v80y2013i4p687-698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards improving the relevance of scenarios for public policy questions: A proposed methodological framework for policy relevant low carbon scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, Nick

Abstract

A previous review of the use of scenarios in public policy found that the evidence for their impact on policy making was limited. One of the reasons suggested for this lack of policy impact was the disconnection between the time scales explored in long range scenarios, and those typical of the perspective of the policy maker. This paper argues that scenarios can have a valuable role in connecting long term policy goals to their implications for near term decisions. Key to the effectiveness of public policy scenarios in this regard is an actor-based view of the system, which connects long term pathways to the implications of near-term actor decisions. The paper focusses on developing a methodological framework for low carbon scenarios., Reviewing scenario literature, it identifies ‘trend based’, ‘actor based’ and ‘technical feasibility’ scenario approaches, and argues that the insights derived from each of these modes of analysis is important to consider in low carbon scenarios. Moreover, the iteration between these levels as the scenario moves through time is equally important. The paper therefore proposes a 3 level methodological framework as a basis for constructing low carbon scenarios with high policy tractability.

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, Nick, 2013. "Towards improving the relevance of scenarios for public policy questions: A proposed methodological framework for policy relevant low carbon scenarios," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 687-698.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:80:y:2013:i:4:p:687-698
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162512001783
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:80:y:2013:i:4:p:687-698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.