IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v192y2023ics0040162523002676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing crowdfunding adoption from a technology acceptance perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Okine, Agnes Naa Dedei
  • Li, Yao
  • Djimesah, Isaac Edem
  • Zhao, Hongjiang
  • Adjei Budu, Kenneth Wilson
  • Duah, Elijah
  • Kissi Mireku, Kingsford

Abstract

The adoption of crowdfunding technology has not been successful on the African continent as compared to the developed continent. This problem has called for investigations into some factors that can promote the adoption of crowdfunding on the African continent. An extended technology and acceptance model was proposed to empirically test how crowdfunding can be adopted. Data was collected empirically using a questionnaire from 542 stakeholders of the crowdfunding platform, mostly SME and Startup business owners, to seek their opinion on how the adoption of this financial technology can be feasible. The outcome of the data analysis revealed that all the identified factors positively influence the adoption of crowdfunding based on the intention to use crowdfunding platform, with R2 values of 93% and 73.8% for intention to use crowdfunding and crowdfunding adoption, respectively. The outcome of the research model proposes that crowdfunding adoption is influenced by factors such as perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of crowdfunding, smart device usage readiness, technology readiness and adoption, and intention to use crowdfunding platform. This study offers valuable insight into the extended technology acceptance model and how crowdfunding can be adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Okine, Agnes Naa Dedei & Li, Yao & Djimesah, Isaac Edem & Zhao, Hongjiang & Adjei Budu, Kenneth Wilson & Duah, Elijah & Kissi Mireku, Kingsford, 2023. "Analyzing crowdfunding adoption from a technology acceptance perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:192:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523002676
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523002676
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:192:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523002676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.