IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v162y2021ics0040162520312208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What antecedent attitudes motivate actors to commit to the ecosystem of digital social innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo, L.
  • Palacios, M.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify those antecedent factors affecting the commitment among professionals and managers of projects and initiatives that are part of the ecosystem of Digital Social Innovation (DSI) in Spain. These factors are related to the commitment experienced towards their job, as well as to their commitment to the cause or social goal pursued by the project or organization. The study of the literature allows the development of an iterative theoretical framework that measures the most relevant variables that affect the attitude of these actors. Finally, a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is carried out to test a new model looking for those antecedent attitudes that become core conditions to the success of organizational commitment. What emerges from the research is that the presence of antecedent factors that belong to the cognitive dimension leads to a high level of commitment, while the absence of some factors from the affective dimension, together with high levels of anxiety, lead to a lack of commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo, L. & Palacios, M., 2021. "What antecedent attitudes motivate actors to commit to the ecosystem of digital social innovation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:162:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520312208
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162520312208
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sascha Kraus & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano & Miriam Schüssler, 2018. "Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 15-33, March.
    2. Cédric Gossart & Müge Özman Gossart, 2018. "Digital social innovation: exploring an emerging ecosystem," Post-Print hal-01991087, HAL.
    3. Cajaiba-Santana, Giovany, 2014. "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 42-51.
    4. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Jones, Paul & Pickernell, David, 2020. "Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 443-455.
    5. Martin R Schneider & Conrad Schulze-Bentrop & Mihai Paunescu, 2010. "Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 41(2), pages 246-266, February.
    6. Söderholm, Patrik & Hellsmark, Hans & Frishammar, Johan & Hansson, Julia & Mossberg, Johanna & Sandström, Annica, 2019. "Technological development for sustainability: The role of network management in the innovation policy mix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 309-323.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Tiffany Hui-Kuang & Huarng, Kun-Huang & Lai, Yun Ting, 2021. "Configural analysis of innovation for exploring economic growth," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Kabengele, Christian & Hahn, Rüdiger, 2021. "Institutional and firm-level factors for mobile money adoption in emerging markets–A configurational analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    3. Piotr Tomasz Makowski & Yuya Kajikawa, 2021. "Automation-driven innovation management? Toward Innovation-Automation-Strategy cycle," Papers 2103.02395, arXiv.org.
    4. Rodrigo, L & Pérez-Arechaederra, D & Palacios, M & Romero, J, 2022. "Organisational commitment in the digital social innovation context: does qualitative comparative analysis add information to linear regression?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Joti kumari & Jai Kumar, 2023. "Influence of motivation on teachers’ job performance," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Makowski, Piotr Tomasz & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2021. "Automation-driven innovation management? Toward Innovation-Automation-Strategy cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Souiden, Nizar & Amara, Nabil & Chaouali, Walid, 2020. "Optimal image mix cues and their impacts on consumers’ purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent & Marta Mas-Machuca & Patricia Guix, 2021. "Impact of mission statement components on social enterprises’ performance," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 705-724, April.
    3. María Huertas González-Serrano & Josep Crespo Hervás & Irena Valantine & Manuel Alonso Dos-Santos & Ferran Calabuig Moreno, 2020. "Impact of lifestyle oriented-motivation and corporate social responsibility on multiadventure sports firms´ performance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 935-959, September.
    4. Paiola, Marco & Khvatova, Tatiana & Schiavone, Francesco & Jabeen, Fauzia, 2022. "Paths toward advanced service-oriented business models: A configurational analysis of small- and medium-sized incumbent manufacturers11A previous version of the present article was presented at the EI," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    5. Stratu-Strelet, Doina & Gil-Gómez, Hermenegildo & Oltra-Badenes, Raúl & Oltra-Gutierrez, Juan Vicente, 2023. "Developing a theory of full democratic consolidation: Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing eastern European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Jerónimo, Helena Mateus & Henriques, Paulo Lopes & Lacerda, Teresa Correia de & da Silva, Filipa Pires & Vieira, Pedro Rino, 2020. "Going green and sustainable: The influence of green HR practices on the organizational rationale for sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 413-421.
    7. Juan Wu & Yaokuang Li & Daru Zhang, 2019. "Identifying women’s entrepreneurial barriers and empowering female entrepreneurship worldwide: a fuzzy-set QCA approach," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 905-928, September.
    8. Estevão, João & Lopes, José Dias & Penela, Daniela & Soares, José Miguel, 2020. "The Doing Business ranking and the GDP. A qualitative study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 435-442.
    9. De Crescenzo, Veronica & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo Enrique & Covin, Jeffrey G., 2020. "Exploring the viability of equity crowdfunding as a fundraising instrument: A configurational analysis of contingency factors that lead to crowdfunding success and failure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 348-356.
    10. Komlósi, Éva & Sebestyén, Tamás & Tóth-Pajor, Ákos & Bedő, Zsolt, 2022. "Do specific entrepreneurial ecosystems favor high-level networking while others not? Lessons from the Hungarian IT sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Zhike Lv & María Rodríguez-García & Javier Sendra-García, 2021. "Does institutional quality affect the level of entrepreneurial success differently across the entrepreneurship distribution?," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 937-955, May.
    12. Cayetano Medina Molina & Domingo Ribeiro Soriano & Cristina Blanco González-Tejero, 2023. "Multi-level corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: an intra-metropolitan analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2185-2213, October.
    13. Del Sarto, Nicola & Isabelle, Diane A. & Di Minin, Alberto, 2020. "The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    14. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    15. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach, 2021. "Corruption Shock in Mexico: fsQCA Analysis of Entrepreneurial Intention in University Students," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-31, July.
    16. Kusa, Rafał & Suder, Marcin & Duda, Joanna, 2023. "Impact of greening on performance in the hospitality industry: Moderating effect of flexibility and inter-organizational cooperation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    17. Fathallah, Ramzi & Carney, Michael, 2024. "The business family as an institutional arbitrageur: Internationalization across institutional contexts," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(2).
    18. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    19. Petteri Repo & Kaisa Matschoss, 2019. "Social Innovation for Sustainability Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Torres, Pedro & Augusto, Mário & Godinho, Pedro, 2017. "Predicting high consumer-brand identification and high repurchase: Necessary and sufficient conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 52-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:162:y:2021:i:c:s0040162520312208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.