IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v149y2019ics0040162519306407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving ridesplitting services using optimization procedures on a shareability network: A case study of Chengdu

Author

Listed:
  • Tu, Meiting
  • Li, Ye
  • Li, Wenxiang
  • Tu, Minchao
  • Orfila, Olivier
  • Gruyer, Dominique

Abstract

Ridesourcing services play a crucial role in metropolitan transportation systems and aggravate urban traffic congestion and air pollution. Ridesplitting is one possible way to reduce these adverse effects and improve the transport efficiency, especially during rush hours. This paper aims to explore the potential of ridesplitting during peak hours using empirical ridesourcing data provided by DiDi Chuxing, which contains complete datasets of ridesourcing orders in the city of Chengdu, China. A ridesplitting trip identification algorithm based on a shareability network is developed to quantify the potential of ridesplitting. Then, we evaluate the gap between the potential and actual scales of ridesplitting. The results show that the percentage of potential cost savings can reach 18.47% with an average delay of 4.76 min, whereas the actual percentage is 1.22% with an average delay of 9.86 min. The percentage of shared trips can be increased from 7.85% to 90.69%, and the percentage of time savings can reach 25.75% from 2.38%. This is the first investigation of the gap between the actual scale and the potential of ridesplitting on a city scale. The proposed ridesplitting algorithm can not only bring benefits on a city level but also take passenger delays into consideration. The quantitative benefits could encourage transportation management agencies and transportation network companies to develop sensible policies to improve the existing ridesplitting services.

Suggested Citation

  • Tu, Meiting & Li, Ye & Li, Wenxiang & Tu, Minchao & Orfila, Olivier & Gruyer, Dominique, 2019. "Improving ridesplitting services using optimization procedures on a shareability network: A case study of Chengdu," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:149:y:2019:i:c:s0040162519306407
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162519306407
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casprini, Elena & Di Minin, Alberto & Paraboschi, Andrea, 2019. "How do companies organize nascent markets? The BlaBlaCar case in the inter-city shared mobility market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 270-281.
    2. Kirchler, Dominik & Wolfler Calvo, Roberto, 2013. "A Granular Tabu Search algorithm for the Dial-a-Ride Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 120-135.
    3. Rayle, Lisa & Dai, Danielle & Chan, Nelson & Cervero, Robert & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2016. "Just A Better Taxi? A Survey-Based Comparison of Taxis, Transit, and Ridesourcing Services in San Francisco," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt60v8r346, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Laporte, Gilbert, 1992. "The vehicle routing problem: An overview of exact and approximate algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 345-358, June.
    5. Harilaos N. Psaraftis, 1980. "A Dynamic Programming Solution to the Single Vehicle Many-to-Many Immediate Request Dial-a-Ride Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 130-154, May.
    6. Rayle, Lisa & Dai, Danielle & Chan, Nelson & Cervero, Robert & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-178.
    7. Luo, Xiao & Dong, Liang & Dou, Yi & Li, Yan & Liu, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Liang, Hanwei & Mai, Xianmin, 2017. "Factor decomposition analysis and causal mechanism investigation on urban transport CO2 emissions: Comparative study on Shanghai and Tokyo," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 658-668.
    8. Shaheen, Susan PhD & Chan, Nelson, 2016. "Mobility and the Sharing Economy: Potential to Overcome First- and Last-Mile Public Transit Connections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt8042k3d7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Roberto Baldacci & Vittorio Maniezzo & Aristide Mingozzi, 2004. "An Exact Method for the Car Pooling Problem Based on Lagrangean Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 422-439, June.
    10. Cortés, Cristián E. & Matamala, Martín & Contardo, Claudio, 2010. "The pickup and delivery problem with transfers: Formulation and a branch-and-cut solution method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 711-724, February.
    11. Dayarian, Iman & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2016. "An adaptive large-neighborhood search heuristic for a multi-period vehicle routing problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-123.
    12. Braekers, Kris & Caris, An & Janssens, Gerrit K., 2014. "Exact and meta-heuristic approach for a general heterogeneous dial-a-ride problem with multiple depots," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 166-186.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bi, Hui & Ye, Zhirui & Zhao, Jiahui & Chen, Enhui, 2020. "Real trip costs: Modelling intangible costs of urban online car-hailing in Haikou," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 128-140.
    2. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2022. "Dynamic ride-sharing impacts of greater trip demand and aggregation at stops in shared autonomous vehicle systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 114-125.
    3. Zhang, Xin & Zhong, Shiquan & Jia, Ning & Ling, Shuai & Yao, Wang & Ma, Shoufeng, 2024. "A barrier to the promotion of app-based ridesplitting: Travelers’ ambiguity aversion in mode choice," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Xiaomei Li & Yiwen Zhang & Zijie Yang & Yijun Zhu & Cihang Li & Wenxiang Li, 2023. "Modeling Choice Behaviors for Ridesplitting under a Carbon Credit Scheme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Markov, Iliya & Guglielmetti, Rafael & Laumanns, Marco & Fernández-Antolín, Anna & de Souza, Ravin, 2021. "Simulation-based design and analysis of on-demand mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 170-205.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yves Molenbruch & Kris Braekers & An Caris, 2017. "Typology and literature review for dial-a-ride problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 259(1), pages 295-325, December.
    2. Ho, Sin C. & Szeto, W.Y. & Kuo, Yong-Hong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Petering, Matthew & Tou, Terence W.H., 2018. "A survey of dial-a-ride problems: Literature review and recent developments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 395-421.
    3. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    4. Yu, Haitao & Peng, Zhong-Ren, 2019. "Exploring the spatial variation of ridesourcing demand and its relationship to built environment and socioeconomic factors with the geographically weighted Poisson regression," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 147-163.
    5. Hosni, Hadi & Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Artail, Hassan, 2014. "The shared-taxi problem: Formulation and solution methods," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 303-318.
    6. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.
    7. Masoud, Neda & Jayakrishnan, R., 2017. "A decomposition algorithm to solve the multi-hop Peer-to-Peer ride-matching problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-29.
    8. Wong, Yale Z. & Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne, 2020. "Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 5-19.
    9. Liu, Mengyang & Luo, Zhixing & Lim, Andrew, 2015. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for a realistic dial-a-ride problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 267-288.
    10. Sun, Yanshuo & Chen, Zhi-Long & Zhang, Lei, 2020. "Nonprofit peer-to-peer ridesharing optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Mourad, Abood & Puchinger, Jakob & Chu, Chengbin, 2019. "A survey of models and algorithms for optimizing shared mobility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 323-346.
    12. Bi, Hui & Ye, Zhirui & Zhao, Jiahui & Chen, Enhui, 2020. "Real trip costs: Modelling intangible costs of urban online car-hailing in Haikou," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 128-140.
    13. Naoum-Sawaya, Joe & Cogill, Randy & Ghaddar, Bissan & Sajja, Shravan & Shorten, Robert & Taheri, Nicole & Tommasi, Pierpaolo & Verago, Rudi & Wirth, Fabian, 2015. "Stochastic optimization approach for the car placement problem in ridesharing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 173-184.
    14. Quirós, Cipriano & Portela, Javier & Marín, Raquel, 2021. "Differentiated models in the collaborative transport economy: A mixture analysis for Blablacar and Uber," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    15. Tang, Jinjun & Gao, Fan & Han, Chunyang & Cen, Xuekai & Li, Zhitao, 2021. "Uncovering the spatially heterogeneous effects of shared mobility on public transit and taxi," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Hua, Shijia & Zeng, Wenjia & Liu, Xinglu & Qi, Mingyao, 2022. "Optimality-guaranteed algorithms on the dynamic shared-taxi problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Qiao, Si & Yeh, Anthony Gar-On, 2021. "Is ride-hailing a valuable means of transport in newly developed areas under TOD-oriented urbanization in China? Evidence from Chengdu City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Soria, Jason & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2021. "Investigating socio-spatial differences between solo ridehailing and pooled rides in diverse communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    19. Gaul, Daniela & Klamroth, Kathrin & Stiglmayr, Michael, 2022. "Event-based MILP models for ridepooling applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(3), pages 1048-1063.
    20. Aguilera-García, Álvaro & Gomez, Juan & Velázquez, Guillermo & Vassallo, Jose Manuel, 2022. "Ridesourcing vs. traditional taxi services: Understanding users’ choices and preferences in Spain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 161-178.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:149:y:2019:i:c:s0040162519306407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.