IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v83y2013i8p1844-1848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on testing homogeneity of the scale parameters of several inverse Gaussian distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Sadooghi-Alvandi, Soltan Mohammad
  • Malekzadeh, Ahad

Abstract

For testing the equality of scale parameters of several inverse Gaussian distributions, we propose an exact test which is much easier to implement than the test proposed by Chang et al. (2012). Our simulations indicate that our proposed test is also more powerful.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadooghi-Alvandi, Soltan Mohammad & Malekzadeh, Ahad, 2013. "A note on testing homogeneity of the scale parameters of several inverse Gaussian distributions," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(8), pages 1844-1848.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:8:p:1844-1848
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2013.04.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715213001405
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2013.04.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tian, Lili, 2006. "Testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity, based on generalized test variable," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1156-1162, November.
    2. Chang, Ming & You, Xuqun & Wen, Muqing, 2012. "Testing the homogeneity of inverse Gaussian scale-like parameters," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1755-1760.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ali Akbar Jafari & Javad Shaabani, 2020. "Comparing scale parameters in several gamma distributions with known shapes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1927-1950, December.
    2. Mahmood Kharrati-Kopaei & Ahad Malekzadeh, 2019. "On the exact distribution of the likelihood ratio test for testing the homogeneity of scale parameters of several two-parameter exponential distributions: complete and censored samples," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(4), pages 409-427, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wong ACM & Zhang S, 2017. "A Directional Approach for Testing Homogeneity of Inverse Gaussian Scale-Like Parameters," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 3(2), pages 34-39, September.
    2. Mahmood Kharrati-Kopaei, 2021. "On the exact distribution of the likelihood ratio test statistic for testing the homogeneity of the scale parameters of several inverse Gaussian distributions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1123-1138, June.
    3. Chang, Ming & You, Xuqun & Wen, Muqing, 2012. "Testing the homogeneity of inverse Gaussian scale-like parameters," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1755-1760.
    4. Cuizhen Niu & Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2014. "Testing equality of shape parameters in several inverse Gaussian populations," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(6), pages 795-809, August.
    5. Liu, Xuhua & Xu, Xingzhong, 2010. "A new generalized p-value approach for testing the homogeneity of variances," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(19-20), pages 1486-1491, October.
    6. Park, Junyong & Park, DoHwan, 2012. "Testing the equality of a large number of normal population means," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1131-1149.
    7. Li, Xinmin & Tian, Lili & Wang, Juan & Muindi, Josephia R., 2012. "Comparison of quantiles for several normal populations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 2129-2138.
    8. Mohammad Reza Kazemi & Ali Akbar Jafari, 2019. "Inference about the shape parameters of several inverse Gaussian distributions: testing equality and confidence interval for a common value," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(5), pages 529-545, July.
    9. Xu Guo & Hecheng Wu & Gaorong Li & Qiuyue Li, 2017. "Inference for the common mean of several Birnbaum–Saunders populations," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 941-954, April.
    10. Ali Akbar Jafari & Javad Shaabani, 2020. "Comparing scale parameters in several gamma distributions with known shapes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1927-1950, December.
    11. Shi, Jian-Hong & Lv, Jiang-Long, 2012. "A new generalized p-value for testing equality of inverse Gaussian means under heterogeneity," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 96-102.
    12. Ye, Ren-Dao & Ma, Tie-Feng & Wang, Song-Gui, 2010. "Inferences on the common mean of several inverse Gaussian populations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 906-915, April.
    13. Samadrita Bera & Nabakumar Jana, 2022. "On estimating common mean of several inverse Gaussian distributions," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 115-139, January.
    14. Mondal, Anjana & Kumar, Somesh, 2024. "Inference on order restricted means of inverse Gaussian populations under heteroscedasticity," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Liu, Xuhua & Li, Na & Hu, Yuqin, 2015. "Combining inferences on the common mean of several inverse Gaussian distributions based on confidence distribution," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 136-142.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:83:y:2013:i:8:p:1844-1848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.