IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v77y2007i12p1345-1353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A test based on quantile score for c-sample randomized block design

Author

Listed:
  • Sim, Songyong

Abstract

In this article, we consider a rank test for a randomized block design when the responses are from a contaminated distribution. A test statistic is proposed and the asymptotic distributions of the proposed test statistic under the null and local alternative are derived. A small sample simulation study is performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sim, Songyong, 2007. "A test based on quantile score for c-sample randomized block design," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(12), pages 1345-1353, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:77:y:2007:i:12:p:1345-1353
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(07)00098-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sim, Songyong & Kim, Seongbum & Park, Gilju & Park, Jaesoon, 2003. "A two sample quantile test with applications to randomized block designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 439-445, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Rank tests Friedman test;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:77:y:2007:i:12:p:1345-1353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.