IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v69y2004i2p143-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear completeness in a continuous time Gauss-Markov model

Author

Listed:
  • Ibarrola, P.
  • Pérez-Palomares, A.

Abstract

In this paper, we study linear completeness in a continuous time linear model. We give a characterization of this property and we show its equivalence with ordinary completeness when a Gaussian process is considered. Furthermore, a characterization of a sufficient and complete estimator in a continuous time Gaussian model is given.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibarrola, P. & Pérez-Palomares, A., 2004. "Linear completeness in a continuous time Gauss-Markov model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 143-149, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:69:y:2004:i:2:p:143-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(04)00169-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mueller, Jochen, 1987. "Sufficiency and completeness in the linear model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 312-323, April.
    2. Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1996. "Characterization of general ridge estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 145-148, April.
    3. Ibarrola, P. & Pérez-Palomares, A., 2003. "Linear sufficiency and linear admissibility in a continuous time Gauss-Markov model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 315-327, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ibarrola, P. & Pérez-Palomares, A., 2003. "Linear sufficiency and linear admissibility in a continuous time Gauss-Markov model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 315-327, November.
    2. Liu, Xu-Qing & Rong, Jian-Ying & Liu, Xiu-Ying, 2008. "Best linear unbiased prediction for linear combinations in general mixed linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(8), pages 1503-1517, September.
    3. Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1998. "Comparison of linear restricted models with respect to the validity of admissible and linearly sufficient estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 347-354, July.
    4. Stepniak, C., 1997. "Sandwich theorem in comparison of multivariate normal experiments," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 281-284, May.
    5. Liu, Xu-qing & Rong, Jian-ying, 2007. "Nonnegative quadratic estimation and quadratic sufficiency in general linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1180-1194, July.
    6. Liu, Xu-Qing & Wang, Dong-Dong & Rong, Jian-Ying, 2009. "Quadratic prediction and quadratic sufficiency in finite populations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 1979-1988, October.
    7. Heiligers, Berthold & Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1996. "Linear sufficiency and admissibility in restricted linear models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 105-111, October.
    8. Buatikan Mirezi & Selahattin Kaçıranlar, 2023. "Admissible linear estimators in the general Gauss–Markov model under generalized extended balanced loss function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 73-92, February.
    9. Koji Tsukuda & Hiroshi Kurata, 2020. "Covariance structure associated with an equality between two general ridge estimators," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1069-1084, June.
    10. Chaigneau, Pierre, 2018. "The optimal timing of CEO compensation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 90-94.
    11. Markiewicz, Augustyn, 1996. "Characterization of general ridge estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 145-148, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:69:y:2004:i:2:p:143-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.