IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v26y1996i1p43-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood ratio test for the spacing between two adjacent location parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Philip L. H.
  • Lam, K.

Abstract

Suppose Yi is an estimator or sufficient statistic for a location parameter [theta]i (i = 1,...,k) of a location family. Let [theta](1) [less-than-or-equals, slant] 0(2) [less-than-or-equals, slant] ··· [less-than-or-equals, slant] [theta](k) be the ordered parameters. This paper deals with the likelihood ratio test for the hypothesis H0: [theta](k-t+1) - [theta](k-t) [less-than-or-equals, slant] [Delta] versus H1: [theta](k-t+1) - [theta](k-t) > [Delta], where [theta](k-t+1) - [theta](k-t) is the spacing between two adjacent location parameters. It is shown that if the density function of the location family has monotone likelihood ratio, the likelihood ratio test statistic is the corresponding sample spacing. However, this result may not be true for other spacings like the range [theta](k) - [theta](1).

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Philip L. H. & Lam, K., 1996. "Likelihood ratio test for the spacing between two adjacent location parameters," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 43-49, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:26:y:1996:i:1:p:43-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)00250-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:26:y:1996:i:1:p:43-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.