IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v21y1994i5p395-403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independence-distribution-preserving dependency structures for the modified likelihood ratio test for detecting unequal covariance matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Young, Dean M.
  • Seaman, John W.
  • Meaux, Laurie M.

Abstract

The modified likelihood ratio (MLR) test statistic is frequently used to detect unequal covariance matrices. We are concerned with examining this statistic with respect to departures from the usual i.i.d. assumptions on the sample data. In particular we characterize the joint covariance structure of two groups of multivariate normal observations so that the distribution of this MLR test statistic is identical to that under the usual assumption of independent identically distributed observations.

Suggested Citation

  • Young, Dean M. & Seaman, John W. & Meaux, Laurie M., 1994. "Independence-distribution-preserving dependency structures for the modified likelihood ratio test for detecting unequal covariance matrices," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 395-403, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:21:y:1994:i:5:p:395-403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)00037-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:21:y:1994:i:5:p:395-403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.