IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v19y1994i2p131-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pitman comparison of unbiased linear estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Fountain, Robert L.
  • Keating, Jerome P.

Abstract

The canonical form for the comparison of certain linear estimators using Pitman's Measure of Closeness is generalized to the class of all linear estimators. Under the assumption of normality, the equivalence of Pitman-closest linear unbiased estimators and best linear unbiased estimators is shown. A sufficient condition is given for which the BLUE will be Pitman-closer than the best linear equivalent estimator (BLEE).

Suggested Citation

  • Fountain, Robert L. & Keating, Jerome P., 1994. "The Pitman comparison of unbiased linear estimators," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 131-136, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:19:y:1994:i:2:p:131-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167-7152(94)90145-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jibo Wu & Hu Yang, 2016. "More on the unbiased ridge regression estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 31-42, March.
    2. Elham Mirfarah & Jafar Ahmadi, 2014. "Pitman closeness of $$k$$ k -records from two sequences to progressive Type-II censored order statistics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 1279-1300, October.
    3. Razmkhah, M. & Ahmadi, Jafar, 2013. "Pitman closeness of current k-records to population quantiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 148-156.
    4. Jafar Ahmadi & Elham Mirfarah & Ahmad Parsian, 2016. "Robust Bayesian Pitman closeness," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 79(6), pages 671-691, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:19:y:1994:i:2:p:131-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.