IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v122y2017icp211-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three-level A- and D-optimal paired choice designs

Author

Listed:
  • Chai, Feng-Shun
  • Das, Ashish
  • Singh, Rakhi

Abstract

For three-level paired choice designs, we obtain a sharper lower bound to the A- and D-values for estimating the main effects under the utility-neutral multinomial logit model. New A- and D-optimal (and efficient) designs are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Chai, Feng-Shun & Das, Ashish & Singh, Rakhi, 2017. "Three-level A- and D-optimal paired choice designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 211-217.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:122:y:2017:i:c:p:211-217
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2016.11.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715216302711
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2016.11.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rakhi Singh & Feng-Shun Chai & Ashish Das, 2015. "Optimal two-level choice designs for any number of choice sets," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(4), pages 967-973.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manna, Soumen & Das, Ashish, 2016. "Optimal two-level designs for partial profile choice experiments," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 80-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:122:y:2017:i:c:p:211-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.