IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v74y2012i7p1029-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medical pluralism and medical marginality: Bone doctors and the selective legitimation of therapeutic expertise in India

Author

Listed:
  • Lambert, Helen

Abstract

Current health policy initiatives in India advocate medical pluralism and seek to address a lack of skilled human resources for health care provision. This qualitative study investigated a form of indigenous therapy that does not fit into officially recognised categories of ‘Indian medicine’ but is a popular source of informal medical care. Semi-structured interviews and ethnographic observations of 30 ‘bone doctor’ (haad vaidya) practices were conducted in the capital city of Rajasthan, north India in 2009–2010 together with historical analysis of changes in state policies for the registration of Indian medicine practitioners. Contestations over legitimacy among individual practitioners and hierarchies of authority between different medical traditions are shown to rest on conceptions of what constitutes authentic ‘expertise’. The findings demonstrate a progressive restriction over time in official definitions of medical expertise, towards a reliance exclusively on formal qualifications rather than experientially acquired and inherited skills to demarcate legitimate therapeutic knowledge. This case study contributes to our understanding of the nature of non-professional expertise and its implications for pluralistic health care policy and the human resourcing of Indian health systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lambert, Helen, 2012. "Medical pluralism and medical marginality: Bone doctors and the selective legitimation of therapeutic expertise in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(7), pages 1029-1036.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:7:p:1029-1036
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953612000469
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Shamshad, 2006. "Systems of medicine and nationalist discourse in India: Towards "new horizons" in medical anthropology and history," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2786-2797, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Perrotta, Manuela & Geampana, Alina, 2020. "The trouble with IVF and randomised control trials: Professional legitimation narratives on time-lapse imaging and evidence-informed care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Patel, Gupteswar & Brosnan, Caragh & Taylor, Ann & Garimella, Surekha, 2021. "The dynamics of TCAM integration in the Indian public health system: Medical dominance, countervailing power and co-optation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadine Ijaz & Heather Boon, 2018. "Medical Pluralism and the State: Regulatory Language Requirements for Traditional Acupuncturists in English-Dominant Diaspora Jurisdictions," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, April.
    2. M.S. Harilal, 2008. "Home to Market: Response,Resurgence and Transformation of Ayurveda from 1830's to 1920," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 408, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
    3. Ijaz, Nadine & Boon, Heather & Muzzin, Linda & Welsh, Sandy, 2016. "State risk discourse and the regulatory preservation of traditional medicine knowledge: The case of acupuncture in Ontario, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 97-105.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:74:y:2012:i:7:p:1029-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.