IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v73y2011i1p1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between distance to social gathering facilities and risk of trachoma for households in rural Tanzanian communities

Author

Listed:
  • Montgomery, Maggie A.
  • Desai, Mayur M.
  • Groce, Nora E.
  • Elimelech, Menachem

Abstract

Few studies have examined the physical isolation of households with trachoma cases. Thus, in this study, we sought to examine the association between household isolation, as measured by distance to social gathering facilities, and risk of trachoma. We hypothesized that households located closer to such facilities would have a decreased risk of trachoma, due to a variety of social, economic, and cultural reasons. To test this hypothesis we conducted a case-control study of 668 households (93 cases, 575 controls) in eight villages in Kongwa District, Tanzania, in 2007. Case households were defined as having a child aged 1-5 years with clinical signs of trachoma. Distance of household's place of residence to three main social gathering facilities -- bars/cafés, religious establishments, and commercial/government center -- was measured with a portable geographic positioning system. Multiple logistic regression analyses, which controlled for potential confounders and accounted for clustering, demonstrated increased risk of trachoma with increasing distance to social gathering facilities. Compared with distances of 1400Â m from bars/cafés and from religious establishments, suggesting increased risk of trachoma for households at the fringes of communities. Targeting these isolated households with special programming along with dissemination through trusted social gathering facilities may improve effectiveness of current prevention efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Montgomery, Maggie A. & Desai, Mayur M. & Groce, Nora E. & Elimelech, Menachem, 2011. "Relationship between distance to social gathering facilities and risk of trachoma for households in rural Tanzanian communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 1-5, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:1:p:1-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611002644
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldman, Noreen & Pebley, Anne R. & Beckett, Megan, 2001. "Diffusion of ideas about personal hygiene and contamination in poor countries: evidence from Guatemala," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 53-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Lunn, 2020. "Urban family ties and household latrines in rural India: A cross-sectional analysis of national data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Dana A. Glei & Noreen Goldman & German Rodriguez, 2002. "Utilization of Care During Pregnancy in Rural Guatemala: Does Obstetrical Need Matters," Working Papers 308, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Office of Population Research..
    3. Lindstrom, David P & Muñoz-Franco, Elisa, 2006. "Migration and maternal health services utilization in rural Guatemala," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 706-721, August.
    4. Alberto Palloni & Mary McEniry & Yiyue Huangfu & Hiram Beltran-Sanchez, 2020. "Impacts of the 1918 flu on survivors' nutritional status: A double quasi-natural experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Little, Emily E. & Polanco, Maria Alejandra & Baldizon, Salvador R. & Wagner, Pascale & Shakya, Holly, 2019. "Breastfeeding knowledge and health behavior among Mayan women in rural Guatemala," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:1:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.