IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i6p855-866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: Evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • O'Campo, Patricia
  • Kirst, Maritt
  • Tsamis, Charoula
  • Chambers, Catharine
  • Ahmad, Farah

Abstract

We undertook a synthesis of existing studies to re-evaluate the evidence on program mechanisms of intimate partner violence (IPV) universal screening and disclosure within a health care context by addressing how, for whom, and in what circumstances these programs work. Our review is informed by a realist review approach, which focuses on program mechanisms. Systematic, realist reviews can help reveal why and how interventions work and can yield information to inform policies and programs. A review of the scholarly literature from January 1990 to July 2010 identified 5046 articles, 23 of which were included in our study. We identified studies on 17 programs that evaluated IPV screening. We found that programs that took a comprehensive approach (i.e., incorporated multiple program components, including institutional support) were successful in increasing IPV screening and disclosure/identification rates. Four program components appeared to increase provider self-efficacy for screening, including institutional support, effective screening protocols, thorough initial and ongoing training, and immediate access/referrals to onsite and/or offsite support services. These findings support a multi-component comprehensive IPV screening program approach that seeks to build provider self-efficacy for screening. Further implications for IPV screening intervention planning and implementation in health care settings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Campo, Patricia & Kirst, Maritt & Tsamis, Charoula & Chambers, Catharine & Ahmad, Farah, 2011. "Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: Evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 855-866, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:6:p:855-866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(11)00032-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wiist, W.H. & McFarlane, J., 1999. "The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 89(8), pages 1217-1221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mlinarić, Martin & Hoffmann, Laura & Lindfors, Pirjo & Richter, Matthias, 2020. "Enhancing implementation of smoke-free places: A comparative qualitative study across seven European cities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Molnar, Agnes & O’Campo, Patricia & Ng, Edwin & Mitchell, Christiane & Muntaner, Carles & Renahy, Emilie & St. John, Alexander & Shankardass, Ketan, 2015. "Protocol: Realist synthesis of the impact of unemployment insurance policies on poverty and health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Patrizia Di Giacomo & Alessandra Cavallo & AnnaMaria Bagnasco & Marina Sartini & Loredana Sasso, 2017. "Violence against women: knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2307-2316, August.
    4. Nerissa Crombie & Leesa Hooker & Sonia Reisenhofer, 2017. "Nurse and midwifery education and intimate partner violence: a scoping review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2100-2125, August.
    5. Jessica R Williams & Valerie Halstead & Deborah Salani & Natasha Koermer, 2017. "An exploration of screening protocols for intimate partner violence in healthcare facilities: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2192-2201, August.
    6. Ingrid Tyler & Judith Lynam & Patricia O’Campo & Heather Manson & Meghan Lynch & Behnoosh Dashti & Nicole Turner & Andrea Feller & Elizabeth Lee Ford-Jones & Sue Makin & Christine Loock, 2019. "It takes a village: a realist synthesis of social pediatrics program," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(5), pages 691-701, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bosena Tebeje Gashaw & Berit Schei & Kari Nyheim Solbraekke & Jeanette H. Magnus, 2020. "Ethiopian Health Care Workers’ Insights into and Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:6:p:855-866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.