IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v71y2010i9p1548-1556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cancergazing? CA125 and post-treatment surveillance in advanced ovarian cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Jordens, Christopher F.C.
  • Morrell, Bronwen
  • Harnett, Paul
  • Hobbs, Kim
  • Mason, Catherine
  • Kerridge, Ian H.

Abstract

Post-treatment surveillance of advanced ovarian cancer involves regular testing of asymptomatic patients using the CA125 test. This practice is based on a rationale that is not supported by evidence from clinical trials. This paper aims to stimulate critical reflection concerning the effect of investigative tests on clinical decisions and interactions, and the experience of illness, particularly in the context of advanced malignant disease. Drawing on the idea of the "medical gaze", and building on previous health communication research, we present an analysis of in-depth interviews and psychometric tests collected in a prospective study of 20 Australian women with advanced ovarian cancer conducted between 2006 and 2009. We describe the demands placed on patients by the use of the CA125 test, some hazards it creates for decision-making, and some of the test's subjective benefits. It is widely believed that the CA125 test generates anxiety among patients, and the proposed solution is to educate women more about the test. We found no evidence that anxiety was a problem requiring a response over and above existing services. We conclude that the current debate is simplistic and limited. Focussing on patient anxiety does not account for other important effects of post-treatment surveillance, and educating patients about the test is unlikely to mitigate anxiety because testing is part of a wider process by which patients become aware of a disease that - once it has relapsed - will certainly kill them in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jordens, Christopher F.C. & Morrell, Bronwen & Harnett, Paul & Hobbs, Kim & Mason, Catherine & Kerridge, Ian H., 2010. "Cancergazing? CA125 and post-treatment surveillance in advanced ovarian cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(9), pages 1548-1556, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:71:y:2010:i:9:p:1548-1556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00601-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, Natalie & Murphy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Weaving meaning? An exploration of the interplay between lay and professional understandings of cervical cancer risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1074-1082, October.
    2. Little, Miles & Jordens, Christopher FC & Paul, Kim & Montgomery, Kathleen & Philipson, Bertil, 1998. "Liminality: a major category of the experience of cancer illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1485-1494, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shubin, Sergei & Rapport, Frances & Seagrove, Anne, 2015. "Complex and dynamic times of being chronically ill: Beyond disease trajectories of patients with ulcerative colitis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 105-112.
    2. Greenhalgh, Trisha & Wherton, Joe & Sugarhood, Paul & Hinder, Sue & Procter, Rob & Stones, Rob, 2013. "What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 86-94.
    3. Paul Stenner & Raffaele De Luca Picione, 2023. "A Theoretically Informed Critical Review of Research Applying the Concept of Liminality to Understand Experiences with Cancer: Implications for a New Oncological Agenda in Health Psychology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    5. MacDonald, Chelsea & Theurer, Julie A. & Doyle, Philip C., 2021. "“Cured” but not “healed”: The application of principles of palliative care to cancer survivorship," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    6. Foley, Rose-Anna & Hurard, Lucie Lechevalier & Anchisi, Annick & Anchisi, Sandro, 2019. "Rising to the medication's requirements: The experience of elderly cancer patients receiving palliative chemotherapy in the elective oncogeriatrics field," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Werner-Lin, Allison & Forbes Shepherd, Rowan & Young, Jennifer L. & Wilsnack, Catherine & Merrill, Shana L. & Greene, Mark H. & Khincha, Payal P., 2022. "Embodied risk for families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Like electricity through my body," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    8. Standing, Holly C. & Rapley, Tim & MacGowan, Guy A. & Exley, Catherine, 2017. "‘Being’ a ventricular assist device recipient: A liminal existence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 141-148.
    9. Elisabeth Dahlborg Lyckhage & Anna Gardvik & Helena Karlsson & Jenny Törner Mulari & Ina Berndtsson, 2015. "Young Women With Anorexia Nervosa," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, March.
    10. Gaspar, Mark & Rosenes, Ron & Burchell, Ann N. & Grennan, Troy & Salit, Irving & Grace, Daniel, 2020. "Diagnosing uncertainty: The challenges of implementing medical screening programs for minority sub-populations in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    11. Wilson, Kate & Luker, Karen A, 2006. "At home in hospital? Interaction and stigma in people affected by cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 1616-1627, April.
    12. Nicholson, C. & Meyer, J. & Flatley, M. & Holman, C. & Lowton, K., 2012. "Living on the margin: Understanding the experience of living and dying with frailty in old age," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1426-1432.
    13. Granek, Leeat & Fergus, Karen, 2012. "Resistance, agency, and liminality in women's accounts of symptom appraisal and help-seeking upon discovery of a breast irregularity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(10), pages 1753-1761.
    14. Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia & Brage, Eugenia, 2017. "What is not, but might be: The disnarrated in parents' stories of their child's cancer treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 16-22.
    15. Pienaar, Kiran & Petersen, Alan & Bowman, Diana M., 2019. "Matters of fact and politics: Generating expectations of cancer screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 408-416.
    16. Robin Digby & Susan Lee & Allison Williams, 2018. "The liminality of the patient with dementia in hospital," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 70-79, January.
    17. Coventry, Peter A. & Dickens, Chris & Todd, Chris, 2014. "How does mental–physical multimorbidity express itself in lived time and space? A phenomenological analysis of encounters with depression and chronic physical illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 108-118.
    18. Susanne Kean & Lisa G Salisbury & Janice Rattray & Timothy S Walsh & Guro Huby & Pamela Ramsay, 2017. "‘Intensive care unit survivorship’ – a constructivist grounded theory of surviving critical illness," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3111-3124, October.
    19. Macdonald, Sara & Conway, Elaine & Bikker, Annemieke & Browne, Susan & Robb, Kathryn & Campbell, Christine & Steele, Robert JC. & Weller, David & Macleod, Una, 2019. "Making sense of bodily sensations: Do shared cancer narratives influence symptom appraisal?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 31-39.
    20. Boardman, Felicity & Clark, Corinna, 2022. "‘We're kind of like genetic nomads': Parents' experiences of biographical disruption and uncertainty following in/conclusive results from newborn cystic fibrosis screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:71:y:2010:i:9:p:1548-1556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.