IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i5p754-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients' narrative accounts of open-heart surgery and recovery: Authorial voice of technology

Author

Listed:
  • Lapum, Jennifer
  • Angus, Jan E.
  • Peter, Elizabeth
  • Watt-Watson, Judy

Abstract

In this narrative inquiry, we examined patients' experiential accounts of technology in open-heart surgery and recovery. A convenience sample of sixteen individuals was recruited from a preoperative clinic at a regional centre for cardiac services in Canada. Each participated in two interviews following transfer from cardiovascular intensive care and 4-6 weeks post discharge from the hospital. Participants also documented their experiences in journals during the first 3-4 weeks following discharge. The focal point of the study's theoretical foundations was narrative emplotment, which directs attention to the active processes of plot construction and shaping forces of stories. In our narrative analysis, we used narrative mapping to document the temporal flow of events. We found that technology acted as the authorial voice, or controlling influence, over how participants' narratives were shaped and unfolded. Key were the ways in which technology as the authorial voice was linked with participants becoming background characters and surrendering agency. Problematic and important to health care professionals is ensuring that authorial voice shifts back to patients so that they become active in shaping their own course of recovery. This study underscores the benefits of using literary techniques such as narrative analysis in health science research. Examining the narrative structures and forces that shape patients' stories sheds light on how health care professionals and their technologically-driven practices of care strongly affect the stories' content and how they unfold. By focusing on how stories unfolded, we revealed ways in which cardiac surgery practices and patients' course of recovery could be enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Lapum, Jennifer & Angus, Jan E. & Peter, Elizabeth & Watt-Watson, Judy, 2010. "Patients' narrative accounts of open-heart surgery and recovery: Authorial voice of technology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 754-762, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:754-762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00816-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mattingly, Cheryl, 1994. "The concept of therapeutic 'emplotment'," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 811-822, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jennifer L. Lapum & Linda Liu & Kathryn Church & Terrence M. Yau & Perin Ruttonsha & Alison Matthews David & Bruk Retta, 2014. "Arts-Informed Research Dissemination in the Health Sciences," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rhodes, Tim & Bernays, Sarah & Terzic, Katarina Jankovic, 2009. "Medical promise and the recalibration of expectation: Hope and HIV treatment engagement in a transitional setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1050-1059, March.
    2. Waldram, James B. & Hatala, Andrew R., 2015. "Latent and manifest empiricism in Q'eqchi' Maya healing: A case study of HIV/AIDS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 9-16.
    3. Dumit, Joseph, 2006. "Illnesses you have to fight to get: Facts as forces in uncertain, emergent illnesses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 577-590, February.
    4. Radley, Alan & Mayberry, John & Pearce, Melanie, 2008. "Time, space and opportunity in the outpatient consultation: 'The doctor's story'," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1484-1496, April.
    5. Smit, Anri & Coetzee, Bronwynè Jo’sean & Roomaney, Rizwana & Bradshaw, Melissa & Swartz, Leslie, 2019. "Women's stories of living with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 231-245.
    6. Thomas, Felicity & Aggleton, Peter & Anderson, Jane, 2010. "'Experts', 'partners' and 'fools': Exploring agency in HIV treatment seeking among African migrants in London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 736-743, March.
    7. Eva Laerkner & Ingrid Egerod & Finn Olesen & Palle Toft & Helle Ploug Hansen, 2019. "Negotiated mobilisation: An ethnographic exploration of nurse–patient interactions in an intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2329-2339, June.
    8. Rhodes, Tim & Ruiz Osorio, Maria Paula & Maldonado Martinez, Adriana & Restrepo Henao, Alexandra & Lancaster, Kari, 2024. "Exhausting care: On the collateral realities of caring in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    9. Ipsiroglu, Osman S. & McKellin, William H. & Carey, Norma & Loock, Christine, 2013. "“They silently live in terror…” why sleep problems and night-time related quality-of-life are missed in children with a fetal alcohol spectrum disorder," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 76-83.
    10. Anthony T. Carter, 2008. "Creative providers: Counseling and counselors in family planning and reproductive health," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(59), pages 1969-2010.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:754-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.