IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v68y2009i2p266-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disease prevalence in the English population: A comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models

Author

Listed:
  • Martin, David
  • Wright, James A.

Abstract

The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is a UK system for monitoring general practitioner (GP) activity and performance, introduced in 2004. The objective of this paper is to explore the potential of QOF datasets as a basis for better understanding geographical variations in disease prevalence in England. In an ecological study, prevalence estimates for four common disease domains (coronary heart disease (CHD), asthma, hypertension and diabetes) were derived from the 2004-2005 QOF primary care disease registers for 354 English Local Authority Districts (LADs). These were compared with synthetic estimates from four prevalence models and with self-reported measures of general health from the 2001 census. Prevalence models were recalculated for LADs using demographic and deprivation data from the census. Results were mapped spatially and cross-tabulated against a national classification of local authorities. The four disease domains display different spatial distributions and different spatial relationships with the corresponding prevalence model. For example, the prevalence model for CHD under-estimated QOF cases in northern England, but this north-south pattern was not evident for the other disease domains. The census-derived health measures were strongly correlated with CHD, but not with the other disease domains. The relationship between modelled prevalence and QOF disease registers differs by disease domain, implying that there is no simple cross-domain effect of the QOF process on prevalence figures. Given reliable synthetic estimates of small area prevalence for the QOF disease domains, one potential application of the QOF dataset may be in assessing the geographical extent of under-diagnosis for each domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin, David & Wright, James A., 2009. "Disease prevalence in the English population: A comparison of primary care registers and prevalence models," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 266-274, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:2:p:266-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00524-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R M Haynes & A A Lovett & G Bentham & J S Brainard & S H Gale, 1995. "Comparison of Ward Population Estimates from FHSA Patient Registers with the 1991 Census," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 27(11), pages 1849-1858, November.
    2. Twigg, Liz & Moon, Graham, 2002. "Predicting small area health-related behaviour: a comparison of multilevel synthetic estimation and local survey data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 931-937, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gill Rowlands & David Whitney & Graham Moon, 2018. "Developing and Applying Geographical Synthetic Estimates of Health Literacy in GP Clinical Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-8, August.
    2. Kerstin Hermes & Michael Poulsen, 2013. "The Intraurban Geography of Generalised Trust in Sydney," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(2), pages 276-294, February.
    3. Liz Twigg & Steve Barnard & John Mohan & Kelvyn Jones, 2006. "Developing and Evaluating Small-Area Indicators of the Neighbourhood Social Environment," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 38(11), pages 2173-2192, November.
    4. David Manley & Kelvyn Jones & Ron Johnston, 2017. "The geography of Brexit – What geography? Modelling and predicting the outcome across 380 local authorities," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 183-203, May.
    5. Moon, Graham & Twigg, Liz & Jones, Kelvyn & Aitken, Grant & Taylor, Joanna, 2019. "The utility of geodemographic indicators in small area estimates of limiting long-term illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 47-55.
    6. Moon, Graham & Quarendon, Gemma & Barnard, Steve & Twigg, Liz & Blyth, Bill, 2007. "Fat nation: Deciphering the distinctive geographies of obesity in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 20-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:2:p:266-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.