IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i4p963-969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurial ventures and whole-body donations: A regional perspective from the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Anteby, Michel
  • Hyman, Mikell

Abstract

Human cadavers are crucial to medical science. While the debate on how to secure sufficient cadavers has focused primarily on donors' behaviors, procuring organizations' roles in increasing donations remain less explored. The United States offers a unique setting in which to examine this question since entrepreneurial ventures supplying cadavers for medical science have recently emerged alongside traditional academic-housed programs, raising both hopes and fears about their impact on whole-body donations. To assess their potential impact, an archival survey of voluntary, in-state whole-body donors to two programs procuring in the same U.S. state was conducted. The programs' specimen recipients were also analyzed. One program is academic-housed and the other is an entrepreneurial venture. Both offered equal levels of financial support to donating parties. Eighty donations and 120 specimen shipping invoices from 2005 were analyzed in each program. Donations to the two programs did not significantly differ in terms of donors' sex, marital status, maximum educational level, and estimated hourly wage. The entrepreneurial venture's donors were, however, significantly younger, more likely to be from a minority group, and more likely to have died from cancer. For-profit organizations, continuing medical training organizations, and medical device companies were more likely recipients of the entrepreneurial venture's specimens. Non-profit and academic organizations were more likely recipients of the academic-housed program's specimens. These findings suggest that although the programs procured from a somewhat similar pool of donors, they also complemented one another. The entrepreneurial program procured donations that the academic-housed program often did not attract. Specimen recipients' distinct demands partly explain these procurement behaviors. Thus, organizational efforts to meet demands seem to shape the supply. Examining organizations alongside donors might provide new answers to secure donations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anteby, Michel & Hyman, Mikell, 2008. "Entrepreneurial ventures and whole-body donations: A regional perspective from the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 963-969, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:4:p:963-969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00560-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obermann, Konrad, 1998. "Some politico-economic aspects of organ shortage in transplantation medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 299-311, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asad, Asad L. & Anteby, Michel & Garip, Filiz, 2014. "Who donates their bodies to science? The combined role of gender and migration status among California whole-body donors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 53-58.
    2. Vargas, Robert, 2016. "How health navigators legitimize the Affordable Care Act to the uninsured poor," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 263-270.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anteby, Michel, 2009. "A market for human cadavers in all but name?," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 11(1), pages 3-7.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:4:p:963-969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.