IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i1p110-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Most of our social scientists are not institution based... they are there for hire--Research consultancies and social science capacity for health research in East Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Wight, Daniel

Abstract

There is a serious shortage of senior African social scientists to lead health-related research in Africa. This is despite the existence of many African social science graduates, and decades of Northern funded research programmes intended to develop local capacity. To investigate the barriers to developing health social science research capacity in East Africa, 29 in-depth interviews, informal conversations and a group discussion were conducted with professionals in this field. Respondents' explanations for inadequate social science research capacity primarily related to under-development and global economic inequalities. However, a recurrent theme was the predominance of individually contracted research consultancies. These seem to divert university staff from academic research, supporting colleagues and training the next generation of researchers, stunt the institutional capacity of university departments, restrict the sharing of research findings and perpetuate donors' control of the research agenda. Although primarily due to macro-economic factors, limited research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa might be ameliorated by modifying the process by which much research is conducted. This exploratory study suggests that institutional research capacity might be strengthened if consultancy research were commissioned through institutions, rather than individuals, with the payment of substantial overheads.

Suggested Citation

  • Wight, Daniel, 2008. "Most of our social scientists are not institution based... they are there for hire--Research consultancies and social science capacity for health research in East Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 110-116, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:1:p:110-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00413-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nchinda, Thomas C., 2002. "Research capacity strengthening in the South," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 1699-1711, June.
    2. Benedetta Rossi, 2004. "Revisiting Foucauldian Approaches: Power Dynamics in Development Projects," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 1-29.
    3. Jentsch, Birgit & Pilley, Catherine, 2003. "Research relationships between the South and the North: Cinderella and the ugly sisters?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(10), pages 1957-1967, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Molyneux, Sassy & Geissler, P. Wenzel, 2008. "Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 685-695, September.
    2. Jasmina Saric & Thomas Breu & Gilbert Fokou & Salome‐Joëlle Gass & Boniface Kiteme & Honorati Masanja & Jürg Utzinger & Gete Zeleke & Fabian Käser, 2023. "Research−implementation organisations and their role for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1401-1416, June.
    3. Wight, Daniel & Ahikire, Josephine & Kwesiga, Joy C., 2014. "Consultancy research as a barrier to strengthening social science research capacity in Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 32-40.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shelley Kotze & Mirek Dymitrow, 2022. "North–South research collaborations: An empirical evaluation against principles of transboundary research," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(2), March.
    2. Décobert, Anne, 2020. "‘The struggle isn’t over’: Shifting aid paradigms and redefining ‘development’ in eastern Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Lucinda Cash-Gibson & Diego F Rojas-Gualdrón & Juan M Pericàs & Joan Benach, 2018. "Inequalities in global health inequalities research: A 50-year bibliometric analysis (1966-2015)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    4. Brill, Gregg & Anderson, Pippin & O'Farrell, Patrick, 2017. "Urban national parks in the global South: Linking management perceptions, policies and practices to water-related ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PB), pages 185-195.
    5. Velho, Lea, 2002. "Research Capacity Building in Nicaragua: From Partnership with Sweden to Ownership and Social Accountability," UNU-INTECH Discussion Paper Series 2002-09, United Nations University - INTECH.
    6. D'Souza, Carol & Sadana, Ritu, 2006. "Why do case studies on national health research systems matter? Identifying common challenges in low- and middle-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 2072-2078, April.
    7. Andrea Rigon, 2016. "Collective or individual titles? Conflict over tenure regularisation in a Kenyan informal settlement," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2758-2778, October.
    8. Afriyie, Kwadwo & Abass, Kabila, 2020. "Profiting from illegality: A discursive analysis of the chainsaw operation in rural Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Andrea Rigon, 2014. "Building Local Governance: Participation and Elite Capture in Slum-upgrading in Kenya," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(2), pages 257-283, March.
    10. Cash-Gibson, Lucinda & Martinez-Herrera, Eliana & Benach, Joan, 2021. "What key conditions and mechanisms generate health inequalities research in different contexts? Study protocol for two realist explanatory case studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Nelius Boshoff, 2010. "South–South research collaboration of countries in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 481-503, August.
    12. Tanya Jakimow & Patrick Kilby, 2006. "Empowering Women," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 375-400, October.
    13. Cruz, Regina C. & Person, Sharina D. & Bittencourt, Lorna & Efing, Ana C. & Scarinci, Isabel C., 2018. "Development and evaluation of a capacity building program in gender-relevant tobacco control research: A Brazilian experience," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-6.
    14. Jin, Ruining & Hoang, Giang & Nguyen, Thi-Phuong & Nguyen, Phuong-Tri & Le, Tam-Tri & La, Viet-Phuong & Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2022. "An analytical framework-based pedagogical method for scholarly community coaching: A proof of concept," OSF Preprints qabhj, Center for Open Science.
    15. Molyneux, Sassy & Geissler, P. Wenzel, 2008. "Ethics and the ethnography of medical research in Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 685-695, September.
    16. Batterbury, Simon P.J. & Fernando, Jude L., 2006. "Rescaling Governance and the Impacts of Political and Environmental Decentralization: An Introduction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1851-1863, November.
    17. Denskus, Tobias, 2012. "Challenging the international peacebuilding evaluation discourse with qualitative methodologies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 148-153.
    18. Mascarello, Júlia & Lehmann, Rosa & Giurca, Alexandru, 2024. "Bioeconomy science collaboration between Brazil and Germany – On equal footing?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Williams, Christopher, 2021. "Global human burden and official development assistance in health R&D: The role of medical absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    20. Razzouk, Denise & Sharan, Pratap & Gallo, Carla & Gureje, Oye & Lamberte, Exaltacion E. & de Jesus Mari, Jair & Mazzotti, Guido & Patel, Vikram & Swartz, Leslie & Olifson, Sylvie & Levav, Itzhak & de , 2010. "Scarcity and inequity of mental health research resources in low-and-middle income countries: A global survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 211-220, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:1:p:110-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.