IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i12p2436-2447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Okubo, Suguru
  • Takahashi, Miyako
  • Kai, Ichiro

Abstract

In recent years, many children with severe or profound congenital hearing loss have undergone treatment to receive cochlear implants; however, the efficacy and risks associated with pediatric cochlear implants are still unknown. Some deaf adults are opposed to parents making the decision regarding cochlear implants for their children. To elucidate the benefits and risks perceived by parents and to investigate parents' decision-making processes, we interviewed 26 parents of deaf children (aged 12 years or younger) who live in the wider Tokyo area, Japan. The results showed that the participants perceived auditory and speech improvements as benefits. On the other hand, participants pointed out various risks associated with cochlear implantation such as medical complications, restrictions on daily activities, cost of cochlear implant upgrades, low effectiveness, and the negative psychosocial impact associated with the implants. Participants who emphasized the benefits of the surgery tended to approve of cochlear implants. Participants who emphasized the risks of the surgery tended to disapprove. All participants, however, were reluctant to make the decision to undergo cochlear implants on behalf of their children due to the uncertain benefits and risks. Participants who believed that early implantation during infancy would be associated with better outcomes regarded their surrogate decision-making as necessary and approved the treatment. This decision, however, was made with certain stipulations; for example, these parents resolved to discuss the decision with their children as they got older, and would give their children the option of having the implant removed. Those who did not believe claims about the effectiveness of early implantation postponed decision-making. These results suggest that guardians face difficulty in decision-making and need information and support from various professionals, deaf adults, parents of children with implants, and children with implants themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Okubo, Suguru & Takahashi, Miyako & Kai, Ichiro, 2008. "How Japanese parents of deaf children arrive at decisions regarding pediatric cochlear implantation surgery: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2436-2447, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:12:p:2436-2447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00107-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen A. Lipstein & William B. Brinkman & Maria T. Britto, 2012. "What Is Known about Parents’ Treatment Decisions? A Narrative Review of Pediatric Decision Making," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 32(2), pages 246-258, March.
    2. Nelson, Pauline Anne & Caress, Ann-Louise & Glenny, Anne-Marie & Kirk, Susan A., 2012. "‘Doing the "Right" Thing’: How parents experience and manage decision-making for children’s ‘Normalising’ surgeries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(5), pages 796-804.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:12:p:2436-2447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.