IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i1p248-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing, integrating, and perpetuating new ways of applying sociology to health, medicine, policy, and everyday life

Author

Listed:
  • Clair, Jeffrey Michael
  • Clark, Cullen
  • Hinote, Brian P.
  • Robinson, Caroline O.
  • Wasserman, Jason A.

Abstract

As a framework for presenting ideas on developing ways to make sociology more applicable, we focus on the recent state of medical sociology research. Data for this paper were generated through a content analysis of a twelve-year period (1993-2004) of the Journal of Health and Social Behavior (JHSB) and Social Science & Medicine (SSM). The analysis aims to determine if the content of JHSB and SSM reflect the breadth of the sub-discipline of medical sociology as well as the stated goals of the journals. The selected issues of JHSB and SSM were coded on the basis of the following attributes: (1) Primary Substantive Topic, (2) Methodology, (3) Data Type and Analytic Technique, and (4) Research and Policy Recommendations. We found that the orientation of JHSB articles was towards generating research and theory that shy away from policy, interdisciplinary approaches, and applied issues. SSM content tends to display more interdisciplinary breadth and variety, but also reflects a dearth of applied recommendations. Our discussion focuses on what JHSB and SSM could be. We present ideas on how the sociological discipline in general--and JHSB and SSM in particular--can help generate and nourish new forms of inquiry that can impact the way research questions are framed. We conclude that such a shift is needed in order to maximize the applicability of social scientific evidence to everyday life, and we share examples situated within a socio-medical context, where there is a particular need for the application of social evidence to practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Clair, Jeffrey Michael & Clark, Cullen & Hinote, Brian P. & Robinson, Caroline O. & Wasserman, Jason A., 2007. "Developing, integrating, and perpetuating new ways of applying sociology to health, medicine, policy, and everyday life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 248-258, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:1:p:248-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00505-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cockerham, William C., 1983. "The state of medical sociology in the United States, Great Britain, West Germany and Austria: Applied vs pure theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(20), pages 1513-1527, January.
    2. Macintyre, Sally, 1996. "Change of editorial structure at Social Science & Medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 901-902, September.
    3. Blaxter, Mildred, 2000. "Medical sociology at the start of the new millennium," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 1139-1142, October.
    4. Van Trigt, Anke M. & De Jong-Van Den Berg, Lolkje T. W. & Voogt, Linda M. & Willems, Jaap & T.Dirk Tromp, F. J. & Haaijer-Ruskamp, Flora M., 1995. "Setting the agenda: Does the medical literature set the agenda for articles about medicines in the newspapers?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 893-899, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Albert, Mathieu & Laberge, Suzanne & Hodges, Brian D. & Regehr, Glenn & Lingard, Lorelei, 2008. "Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2520-2531, June.
    2. Currie, Graeme & El Enany, Nellie & Lockett, Andy, 2014. "Intra-professional dynamics in translational health research: The perspective of social scientists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 81-88.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniele Fanelli, 2013. "Any publicity is better than none: newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(3), pages 1167-1177, June.
    2. Sismondo, Sergio, 2008. "How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1909-1914, May.
    3. Esther Vries & Petra Denig & Sieta T. Vries & Taco B. M. Monster & Jacqueline G. Hugtenburg & Peter G. M. Mol, 2020. "Drug Safety Issues Covered by Lay Media: A Cohort Study of Direct Healthcare Provider Communications Sent between 2001 and 2015 in The Netherlands," Drug Safety, Springer, vol. 43(7), pages 677-690, July.
    4. Benson, Ailsa & Cribb, Alan & Barber, Nick, 2009. "Understanding pharmacists' values: A qualitative study of ideals and dilemmas in UK pharmacy practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2223-2230, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:1:p:248-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.