IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i8p1629-1639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using hormone treatment to reduce the adult height of tall girls: Are women satisfied with the decision in later years?

Author

Listed:
  • Pyett, Priscilla
  • Rayner, Jo
  • Venn, Alison
  • Bruinsma, Fiona
  • Werther, George
  • Lumley, Judith

Abstract

Treatment with synthetic oestrogens to reduce adult height has been available for tall girls since the 1950s. Treatment aims to reduce psychosocial problems associated with tall stature that might occur in adolescence or adulthood, but little is known about the long-term outcomes. This retrospective cohort study identified 1248 eligible women from the medical records of Australian paediatricians who assessed or treated tall girls between 1959 and 1993, and 184 women from self-referrals. They included girls who received oestrogen treatment (diethylstilbestrol or ethinyl estradiol) in adolescence (treated group) and those who had been assessed but did not receive treatment (untreated group). A total of 1243 (86.8%) women were traced and invited to participate in the study, and 67.9% of these women (396 treated and 448 untreated) agreed. This paper reports on women's satisfaction with the decision that was made to have treatment to reduce their adult height. In a postal questionnaire women were asked to comment on a range of issues including how they felt about their current height, the assessment and treatment procedures, and the decision whether or not to have treatment. While untreated women were almost unanimously glad they were not treated (99.1%), no matter how tall they became, 42.1% of the treated women expressed dissatisfaction with the decision that was made. There was no clear association between satisfaction with treatment and the women's final height. However, dissatisfaction was related to: (a) whether or not the girls had an active say in the decision-making; (b) to negative experiences of the assessment or treatment procedures; (c) to side effects experienced during the treatment period; and (d) to later side effects women believed were associated with the treatment. The study finds that qualitative analysis of comments made by treated women helps to explain their dissatisfaction with the decision to have treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pyett, Priscilla & Rayner, Jo & Venn, Alison & Bruinsma, Fiona & Werther, George & Lumley, Judith, 2005. "Using hormone treatment to reduce the adult height of tall girls: Are women satisfied with the decision in later years?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1629-1639, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1629-1639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00111-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. von Hinke Kessler Scholder, Stephanie & Davey Smith, George & Lawlor, Debbie A. & Propper, Carol & Windmeijer, Frank, 2013. "Child height, health and human capital: Evidence using genetic markers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-22.
    2. Rayner, Jo-Anne & Pyett, Priscilla & Astbury, Jill, 2010. "The medicalisation of 'tall' girls: A discourse analysis of medical literature on the use of synthetic oestrogen to reduce female height," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(6), pages 1076-1083, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1629-1639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.