IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i6p1323-1334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The pipeline and the porcupine: alternate metaphors of the physician-industry relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Mather, Charles

Abstract

Industry and medicine share a complicated relationship that engenders a considerable degree of controversy. Although they share a relationship, industry and medicine have different perspectives toward their involvement with each other. Industry conceives of medicine as one aspect of the "drug pipeline", a larger set of relationships that is necessary for producing and marketing products. In contrast, select physicians refer to medicine's relationship with industry as "dancing with the porcupine", an inherently difficult and dangerous activity. This paper compares the "pipeline" and "porcupine" metaphors, and draws upon ethnographic data from fieldwork conducted among clinical neuroscientists at a Canadian medical school to further elucidate the perspectives of physicians toward industry and the nature of the physician-industry relationship. The paper argues that the physician-industry relationship is akin to a type of gift-exchange known as a total prestation, and that this form of total prestation is part of a strategy of capital reconversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Mather, Charles, 2005. "The pipeline and the porcupine: alternate metaphors of the physician-industry relationship," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 1323-1334, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:6:p:1323-1334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00355-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peay, Marilyn Y. & Peay, Edmund R., 1988. "The role of commercial sources in the adoption of a new drug," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(12), pages 1183-1189, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belma Skender, 2024. "The demise of the antibiotic pipeline: the Bayer case," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Sismondo, Sergio, 2008. "How pharmaceutical industry funding affects trial outcomes: Causal structures and responses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1909-1914, May.
    3. Susan F Wood & Joanna Podrasky & Meghan A McMonagle & Janani Raveendran & Tyler Bysshe & Alycia Hogenmiller & Adriane Fugh-Berman, 2017. "Influence of pharmaceutical marketing on Medicare prescriptions in the District of Columbia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wadmann, Sarah & Bang, Lia E., 2015. "Rationalising prescribing: Evidence, marketing and practice-relevant knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 109-116.
    2. Skountridaki, Lila, 2017. "Barriers to business relations between medical tourism facilitators and medical professionals," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 254-266.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:6:p:1323-1334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.