IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i10p2321-2332.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality of life and coping strategies among lung transplant candidates and their family caregivers

Author

Listed:
  • Myaskovsky, Larissa
  • Amanda Dew, Mary
  • Switzer, Galen E.
  • McNulty, Mary L.
  • DiMartini, Andrea F.
  • McCurry, Kenneth R.

Abstract

Although numerous studies have examined coping strategies and quality of life (QOL) among patients with chronic diseases and their family caregivers, no studies have examined the reciprocal effects of patient and caregiver coping strategies on their dyad partner's QOL. Because most people who cope with stressful health experiences do so within the context of interpersonal relationships, it is important to understand the ways in which the two partners' coping strategies may reciprocally affect each other's QOL. Adult lung transplant candidates and their caregivers (N=114 pairs) participated in semi-structured interviews that included measures of QOL and coping with patients' health-related problems. Multivariate, canonical correlation analyses were performed to examine unique patterns of associations between coping and QOL in patient-caregiver dyads. Better patient QOL, across multiple domains, was associated with better caregiver QOL. Multiple elements of patients' coping, including greater use of active coping and emotionally oriented coping were related to generally poorer patient QOL in psychosocial and physical domains. Similarly, caregivers who used more emotionally oriented coping had poorer QOL. There was no statistically reliable relationship between either (a) patient and caregiver use of coping strategies, or (b) caregiver coping and patient QOL. However, patients' coping strategies were important correlates of caregivers' QOL. These findings belie common clinical beliefs that family members' coping responses to patients' health are likely to affect patient well-being. Instead, patients' coping and QOL may be critical for understanding caregiver well-being, especially in the current era in which caregivers are assuming increased responsibility for providing patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Myaskovsky, Larissa & Amanda Dew, Mary & Switzer, Galen E. & McNulty, Mary L. & DiMartini, Andrea F. & McCurry, Kenneth R., 2005. "Quality of life and coping strategies among lung transplant candidates and their family caregivers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 2321-2332, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:10:p:2321-2332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00507-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karen S. Lyons & Steven H. Zarit & Aline G. Sayer & Carol J. Whitlatch, 2002. "Caregiving as a Dyadic Process," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 57(3), pages 195-204.
    2. Rosenthal,Robert, 2009. "Judgment Studies," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521101479, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catalina López-Martínez & Natalia Serrano-Ortega & Sara Moreno-Cámara & Rafael del-Pino-Casado, 2019. "Association between Sense of Coherence and Mental Health in Caregivers of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-10, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:cup:judgdm:v:5:y:2010:i:1:p:21-32 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Eline E. Vos & Simone R. de Bruin & Allard J. van der Beek & Karin I. Proper, 2021. "“ It’s Like Juggling, Constantly Trying to Keep All Balls in the Air ”: A Qualitative Study of the Support Needs of Working Caregivers Taking Care of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. repec:mpr:mprres:6252 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Choi, Heejeong, 2021. "Giving or receiving spouse care and marital satisfaction among older Korean individuals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    5. Yaakov Kareev & Klaus Fiedler, 2004. "Does Decision Quality (Always) Increase with the Size of Information Samples? Some Vicissitudes in Applying the Law of Large Numbers," Discussion Paper Series dp347, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    6. Robert Weathers & Allison Hedley Dodd & Krista Harrison, "undated". "Survey and Research Instruments that Address the Health Effects of Caregiving," Mathematica Policy Research Reports d4906a7ffbc54fab95d1ff43e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. Klaus Fiedler, 2010. "How to study cognitive decision algorithms: The case of the priority heuristic," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 5(1), pages 21-32, February.
    8. Wight, Richard G. & Aneshensel, Carol S. & Murphy, Debra A. & Miller-Martinez, Dana & Beals, Kristin P., 2006. "Perceived HIV stigma in AIDS caregiving dyads," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 444-456, January.
    9. Agree Emily M. & Wolf Douglas A., 2018. "Disability Measurement in the Health and Retirement Study," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:10:p:2321-2332. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.