IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i12p2499-2507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better?

Author

Listed:
  • Shaw, Mary
  • Maxwell, Roy
  • Rees, Karen
  • Ho, Davidson
  • Oliver, Steven
  • Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
  • Ebrahim, Shah

Abstract

Although the mortality and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in England and Wales has declined in recent years, an ageing population has contributed to keeping the prevalence of CHD largely unchanged. Evidence suggests that revascularisation procedures have contributed not only to this decline in mortality, but also to the decline in morbidity from heart disease, and to improvements in quality of life, even in old age. Despite clinical evidence of benefit, revascularisation is less often provided for older people and for women. This paper considers the equity of the provision of revascularisation according to need by gender and age using the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) database which includes all NHS hospital admissions in England. Trends from 1991 to 1999 were examined comparing admissions for acute myocardial infarction (as a proxy indicator of need in the absence of direct measures) and the procedures coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). The rates of CABG and PTCA have increased dramatically by 72% and 48%, respectively, between 1991/3 and 1997/9. Making allowance for differences in need, to achieve equitable provision with men, over 12,000 extra CABG and over 5000 PTCA procedures would be required for women, amounting to 19% and 10% increases in the total volume of each procedure, respectively. Similarly, attempting to meet need up to the age of 79 years would require over 13,000 extra CABG and over 13,000 PTCA procedures for men, and an additional 14,300 CABG and almost 10,000 extra PTCA procedures for women, representing 42% and 40% increases in CABG and PTCA, respectively. As women tend to present with CHD at older ages this indicates that they may be the victims of a 'double whammy' of inequity. Moreover, these inequities have remained constant through the study period. Possible explanations for this shortfall of provision are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaw, Mary & Maxwell, Roy & Rees, Karen & Ho, Davidson & Oliver, Steven & Ben-Shlomo, Yoav & Ebrahim, Shah, 2004. "Gender and age inequity in the provision of coronary revascularisation in England in the 1990s: is it getting better?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 2499-2507, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:12:p:2499-2507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00168-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonsson, Pia Maria & Schmidt, Ingrid & Sparring, Vibeke & Tomson, Goran, 2006. "Gender equity in health care in Sweden--Minor improvements since the 1990s," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 24-36, June.
    2. Huang, Nicole & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Hu, Hsiao-Yun & Lee, Cheng-Hua, 2013. "Gender disparities in AMI management and outcomes among health professionals, their relatives, and non-health professionals in Taiwan from 1997 to 2007," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-74.
    3. Arber, Sara & McKinlay, John & Adams, Ann & Marceau, Lisa & Link, Carol & O'Donnell, Amy, 2006. "Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 103-115, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:12:p:2499-2507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.