IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v58y2004i9p1659-1669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Elovainio, Marko
  • Kivimäki, Mika
  • Steen, Nick
  • Vahtera, Jussi

Abstract

A total of 2969 hospital employees from 162 wards participated in a 2-year follow-up study that examined the relationship between job decision latitude, organizational justice and employee health in Finland. We used medically certified sickness absence records as indicators of health problems. Multilevel covariance structure analysis was applied to take into account the hierarchical nature of the data. Responses from individuals within work units seem not always to be independent, and any models that ignore this lack of independence may incorrectly estimate the between individual relationships. Our results suggest that both job decision latitude and organizational justice varied considerably between work units in addition to individual level variation. Furthermore job decision latitude was associated with organizational justice both at individual and work unit level. Justice evaluations predicted sickness absence only at the individual level.

Suggested Citation

  • Elovainio, Marko & Kivimäki, Mika & Steen, Nick & Vahtera, Jussi, 2004. "Job decision latitude, organizational justice and health: multilevel covariance structure analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1659-1669, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:9:p:1659-1669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00366-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maiju Kangas & Joona Muotka & Mari Huhtala & Anne Mäkikangas & Taru Feldt, 2017. "Is the Ethical Culture of the Organization Associated with Sickness Absence? A Multilevel Analysis in a Public Sector Organization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 131-145, January.
    2. Ybema, Jan F. & van den Bos, Kees, 2010. "Effects of organizational justice on depressive symptoms and sickness absence: A longitudinal perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1609-1617, May.
    3. Koponen, Anne M. & Laamanen, Ritva & Simonsen-Rehn, Nina & Sundell, Jari & Brommels, Mats & Suominen, Sakari, 2010. "Psychosocial work environment and emotional exhaustion--Does a service provision model play a role?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 111-119, February.
    4. Hanne Berthelsen & Hugo Westerlund & Jan Hyld Pejtersen & Emina Hadzibajramovic, 2019. "Construct validity of a global scale for Workplace Social Capital based on COPSOQ III," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Todd Lucas & Ludmila Zhdanova & Craig Wendorf & Sheldon Alexander, 2013. "Procedural and Distributive Justice Beliefs for Self and Others: Multilevel Associations with Life Satisfaction and Self-Rated Health," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 1325-1341, August.
    6. Adam M. Lippert & Grace Venechuk, 2020. "Job Decision Latitude Lowers Worker Stress, but for Whom? Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(6), pages 1009-1017, December.
    7. Marklund, Staffan & Bolin, Malin & von Essen, Jan, 2008. "Can individual health differences be explained by workplace characteristics?--A multilevel analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 650-662, February.
    8. Pérez-Arechaederra, Diana & Briones, Elena & Lind, Allan & García-Ortiz, Luis, 2014. "Perceived Organizational Justice in Care Services: Creation and multi-sample validation of a measure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 26-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:58:y:2004:i:9:p:1659-1669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.