IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v57y2003i4p757-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ageing and public satisfaction with the health service: an analysis of recent trends

Author

Listed:
  • Calnan, Michael
  • Almond, Stephen
  • Smith, Nick

Abstract

One possible explanation for the positive relationship between age and public and user views of health care is that it reflects a generational effect and this relationship has changed over the last decade or so. The analysis carried out in this report examines the relationship between ageing and levels of satisfaction with the health service in the UK using pooled data from the British Social Attitudes Survey, 1983-99. At the descriptive level there is strong evidence of a positive trend between age and satisfaction with general practice and hospital services, and for how the NHS is run but not for NHS primary dental services. Also, when comparing 1983 with 1999 data, there is evidence of a shift down in satisfaction levels for all of these indicators with the widest gap in inpatient services. At the multivariate level there is some evidence to suggest that, over time, the older population value how the NHS is run and GP and dental services at a slightly higher rate compared with the younger population, but the effect is small. This 'age/cohort' interaction effect is, however, negative for inpatient and outpatient services. These findings show little evidence of marked changes in attitude among the elderly or that the elderly are becoming more critical and less positive in their attitude to health care in the UK. The theoretical and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Calnan, Michael & Almond, Stephen & Smith, Nick, 2003. "Ageing and public satisfaction with the health service: an analysis of recent trends," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 757-762, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:4:p:757-762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(03)00128-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Cao & Hao Wu & Linyi Zhou & Feng Ding & Qi Xu & Yan Liu & Hao Xu & Xi Lu, 2024. "Satisfaction Evaluation and Sustainability Optimization of Urban Medical Facilities Based on Residents’ Activity Data in Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Helena Legido-Quigley & Paul Anthony Camacho Lopez & Dina Balabanova & Pablo Perel & Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo & Robby Nieuwlaat & J-D Schwalm & Tara McCready & Salim Yusuf & Martin McKee, 2015. "Patients’ Knowledge, Attitudes, Behaviour and Health Care Experiences on the Prevention, Detection, Management and Control of Hypertension in Colombia: A Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. repec:jet:dpaper:dpaper391 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Footman, Katharine & Roberts, Bayard & Mills, Anne & Richardson, Erica & McKee, Martin, 2013. "Public satisfaction as a measure of health system performance: A study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 62-69.
    5. Aida Isabel Tavares & Pedro Lopes Ferreira, 2020. "Public satisfaction with health system coverage, empirical evidence from SHARE data," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 229-249, September.
    6. Legido-Quigley, Helena & Nolte, Ellen & Green, Judith & la Parra, Daniel & McKee, Martin, 2012. "The health care experiences of British pensioners migrating to Spain: A qualitative study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 46-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:57:y:2003:i:4:p:757-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.