IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v56y2003i5p1099-1109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Parrott, Roxanne L.
  • Silk, Kami J.
  • Condit, Celeste

Abstract

Individual beliefs about the origins of illness and disease contribute to personal behavior to gain or maintain health and well-being. Both perceptions of the efficacy of recommended actions and the confidence individuals have in their ability to carry out prevention and detection practices may be associated with beliefs about illness causation. This study explored the perceptions of African American and European American men and women ages 18-45 years regarding the respective roles of inherited genes, social factors, personal behavior, and ecological environment on disease as compared to other human attributes, including height, weight, mental abilities, and talents. Results from focus group (N=16) data indicated that participants' (N=77) assignment of influence to various causative factors varied non-systematically by gender, race, education, economic class, and type of characteristic.

Suggested Citation

  • Parrott, Roxanne L. & Silk, Kami J. & Condit, Celeste, 2003. "Diversity in lay perceptions of the sources of human traits: genes, environments, and personal behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1099-1109, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:5:p:1099-1109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(02)00106-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gail E. Henderson, 2008. "Introducing Social and Ethical Perspectives on Gene—Environment Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 37(2), pages 251-276, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:5:p:1099-1109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.