IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v56y2003i10p2153-2163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of three interventions to promote workplace health and safety: evidence for the utility of implementation intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Sheeran, Paschal
  • Silverman, Michael

Abstract

This article evaluates a motivational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior, a volitional intervention based on implementation intentions, and a combined motivational plus volitional intervention in promoting attendance at workplace health and safety training courses in the UK. Intervention manipulations were embedded in postal questionnaires completed by participants (N=271). Subsequent attendance over a 3-month period was determined from course records. Findings showed that the volitional and combined interventions doubled the rate of attendance compared to the motivational and control conditions (rates were 39%, 32%, 12%, and 16%, respectively). The effects of the volitional intervention were independent of the effects of previous attendance, demographic variables, employment characteristics, and variables from the theory of planned behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheeran, Paschal & Silverman, Michael, 2003. "Evaluation of three interventions to promote workplace health and safety: evidence for the utility of implementation intentions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 56(10), pages 2153-2163, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:10:p:2153-2163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(02)00220-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md Aktar Kamal & Rakib Hasan Anik, 2019. "Consequences of employees` perception towards their jobs: evidence from the leather industry of Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(11), pages 367-380, November.
    2. Tudor, T.L. & Barr, S.W. & Gilg, A.W., 2007. "Linking intended behaviour and actions: A case study of healthcare waste management in the Cornwall NHS," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23.
    3. Itai Beeri & Dan Gottlieb & Ido Izhaki & Tzipi Eshet & Noam Cohen, 2020. "The Impact of Training on Druze Entrepreneurs’ Attitudes Towards and Intended Behaviors Regarding Local Sustainability Governance: A Field Experiment at the Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Ivan P Lee & Richard M Walker, 2019. "Does source credibility matter for point-of-decision prompts? A quasi-experimental field study to increase stair use," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Lee, Alfred S.Y. & Yung, Patrick Shu-Hang & Mok, Kam-Ming & Hagger, Martin S. & Chan, Derwin K.C., 2020. "Psychological processes of ACL-patients' post-surgery rehabilitation: A prospective test of an integrated theoretical model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:10:p:2153-2163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.