IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v55y2002i7p1213-1229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expanding the scope of health reform: application in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Begley, Charles E.
  • Aday, Lu Ann
  • Lairson, David R.
  • Slater, Carl H.

Abstract

Since the demise of the Clinton national health plan in the early 1990s, a number of states in the US have continued to pursue health reform. The reforms reflect the on-going debate in the US and throughout the world over market-minimizing versus market-maximizing strategies to improve healthcare systems. This paper describes the limits of this debate and supports a broader view that focuses on how health policy can improve population health. Performance measures and indicators traditionally used to evaluate market minimizing/maximizing strategies for reforming healthcare are redefined for evaluating strategies to improve health. Differences in the two views are illustrated by describing state reforms in the US using the market-minimizing/maximizing framework and evaluating the reforms based on the health-related framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Begley, Charles E. & Aday, Lu Ann & Lairson, David R. & Slater, Carl H., 2002. "Expanding the scope of health reform: application in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 1213-1229, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:7:p:1213-1229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00243-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luiz Oscar Machado Martins & Marcio Fernandes dos Reis & Alfredo Chaoubah & Guilhermina Rego, 2023. "Ethnic-Regional Differences in the Allocation of High Complexity Spending in Brazil: Time Analysis 2010–2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. van der Geer, Eric & van Tuijl, Harrie F.J.M. & Rutte, Christel G., 2009. "Performance management in healthcare: Performance indicator development, task uncertainty, and types of performance indicators," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 1523-1530, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:7:p:1213-1229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.