IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v55y2002i12p2171-2175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in low-birthweight among documented and undocumented foreign-born and US-born Latinas

Author

Listed:
  • Kelaher, Margaret
  • Jessop, Dorothy Jones

Abstract

In the USA foreign-born women tend to have fewer low-birthweight births than US-born women from the same ethnicity. This "healthy migrant" effect could be caused by immigration of the fittest or by healthy people being deliberately selected in the immigration process. This study tests these hypotheses by comparing self-reported history of low-birth-weight among foreign-born documented and undocumented Latinas and US-born Latinas. The sample includes 2398 (57.5%) documented foreign-born Latinas, 782 (18.7%) undocumented foreign-born Latinas, and 993 (23.4%) US-born Latinas who initiated prenatal care at MIC-Women's Health Services/MHRA in New York City during 1996-1997. Only women who reported previous live births were included in the sample. Documented foreign-born Latinas were less likely than US-born Latinas to have low-birth-weight babies taking into account parity, age, risk, and education. There were no significant differences between rates of low-birthweight for undocumented foreign-born Latinas and US-born Latinas, or documented foreign-born Latinas. There was, however, a significant trend for rates of low-birthweight to increase from documented foreign-born to undocumented foreign-born to US-born women. This suggests that both official screening and migration of the fittest play a role in lower rates of low-birthweight among foreign-born Latinas compared to US-born Latinas.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelaher, Margaret & Jessop, Dorothy Jones, 2002. "Differences in low-birthweight among documented and undocumented foreign-born and US-born Latinas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 2171-2175, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:12:p:2171-2175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00360-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Korinek, Kim & Smith, Ken R., 2011. "Prenatal care among immigrant and racial-ethnic minority women in a new immigrant destination: Exploring the impact of immigrant legal status," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1695-1703, May.
    2. Teitler, Julien O. & Hutto, Nathan & Reichman, Nancy E., 2012. "Birthweight of children of immigrants by maternal duration of residence in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 459-468.
    3. Erin R. Hamilton & Caitlin Patler & Robin Savinar, 2022. "Immigrant Legal Status Disparities in Health Among First- and One-point-five-Generation Latinx Immigrants in California," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 1241-1260, June.
    4. Wolff, Hans & Stalder, Hans & Epiney, Manuella & Walder, Angela & Irion, Olivier & Morabia, Alfredo, 2005. "Health care and illegality: a survey of undocumented pregnant immigrants in Geneva," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(9), pages 2149-2154, May.
    5. Lisa M. Bates & Julien O. Teitler, 2008. "Immigration and low birthweight in the US: The role of time and timing," Working Papers 1085, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:55:y:2002:i:12:p:2171-2175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.