IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v54y2002i2p281-293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responsibility and cancer disclosure in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Elwyn, Todd S.
  • Fetters, Michael D.
  • Sasaki, Hiroki
  • Tsuda, Tsukasa

Abstract

In Japan, as in many countries around the world, cancer patients are often not told the truth about their illness. Despite polls showing a majority of those surveyed wish to be told, surveys of physicians indicate only a small percentage will tell, especially when the cancer is advanced or terminal. We interviewed physicians from various specialties with experience managing advanced or terminal cancer patients to investigate their approaches to cancer disclosure. Our analysis reveals physicians divide into two groups: those who usually do not tell (non-tellers) such patients and those who usually do tell (tellers). Non-tellers reported the shock of disclosure inhibits telling patients, families' wishes for non-disclosure cannot be ignored, and most patients themselves do not wish to be told. Tellers asserted disclosure is unavoidable and patients want to be told, few problems result when they tell, and telling has many advantages such as not having to lie to the patient. Despite the experience of non-tellers, most physicians continue to follow the traditional approach, for advanced or terminal cancers. Physicians, as well as families and patients, display an aversion to taking responsibility for the potential risks of disclosure, and this may perpetuate the status quo.

Suggested Citation

  • Elwyn, Todd S. & Fetters, Michael D. & Sasaki, Hiroki & Tsuda, Tsukasa, 2002. "Responsibility and cancer disclosure in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 281-293, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:2:p:281-293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(01)00028-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Yen-Yuan & Tsai, Shih-Li & Yang, Chih-Wei & Ni, Yen-Hsuan & Chang, Shan-Chwen, 2013. "The ongoing westernization of East Asian biomedical ethics in Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 125-129.
    2. Specker Sullivan, Laura, 2017. "Dynamic axes of informed consent in Japan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 159-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:54:y:2002:i:2:p:281-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.