IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v52y2001i6p863-870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Wutzke, Sonia E.
  • Shiell, Alan
  • Gomel, Michelle K.
  • Conigrave, Katherine M.

Abstract

The direct costs and health effects of a primary-care-based brief intervention for hazardous alcohol consumption were examined. The total cost of the intervention was calculated from costs associated with: marketing the intervention programme; providing training and support in the use of the intervention materials; physician time required for providing brief advice for 'at-risk' drinkers. The effect of the intervention on health outcomes was expressed in terms of number of life years saved by preventing alcohol-related deaths. This was derived by combining estimates of the impact of the programme if it were implemented nationally with available evidence on the health effects of excess alcohol consumption. Results are based on international trial evidence showing the physical resources required by the intervention and its effectiveness combined with Australian price data. The costs associated with screening and brief advice using the current intervention programme range from Aus$19.14 to Aus$21.50. The marginal costs per additional life year saved were below Aus$1873. The robustness of the model used is supported by an extensive sensitivity analysis. In comparison with existing health promotion strategies the costs and effects of the current intervention are highly encouraging.

Suggested Citation

  • Wutzke, Sonia E. & Shiell, Alan & Gomel, Michelle K. & Conigrave, Katherine M., 2001. "Cost effectiveness of brief interventions for reducing alcohol consumption," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 863-870, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:6:p:863-870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00189-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matilde Machado, 2005. "Substance abuse treatment, what do we know?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 6(1), pages 53-64, March.
    2. Mihajlo Jakovljevic & Mirjana Jovanovic & Nemanja Rancic & Benjamin Vyssoki & Natasa Djordjevic, 2014. "LAT Software Induced Savings on Medical Costs of Alcohol Addicts' Care - Results from a Matched-Pairs Case-Control Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-8, November.
    3. Jenny Saxton & Simone N Rodda & Natalia Booth & Stephanie S Merkouris & Nicki A Dowling, 2021. "The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    4. repec:cte:werepe:we035621 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Luqman Tariq & Matthijs van den Berg & Rudolf T Hoogenveen & Pieter H M van Baal, 2009. "Cost-Effectiveness of an Opportunistic Screening Programme and Brief Intervention for Excessive Alcohol Use in Primary Care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-8, May.
    6. Borghi, Josephine & Jan, Stephen, 2008. "Measuring the benefits of health promotion programmes: Application of the contingent valuation method," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 235-248, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:52:y:2001:i:6:p:863-870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.