IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i9p1295-1312.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multilevel city health profile of Moscow

Author

Listed:
  • McKeehan, I. V.

Abstract

This report describes a multilevel city-wide profile of physical health in Moscow, examining individual and urban level factors. Objectives of the paper were to: (1) identify macro and micro risk factors for poor physical health in Moscow;(2) assess the effect of two dimensions of micro determinants -- personal health habits and social connectivity, such as social cohesion, social support, and social networks; (3) examine the hypothesis that relative social inequality is a significant structural condition at the community level which influences the physical health of individuals, as a main and as a joint effect with psychosocial behaviors. A random sample of Moscow adults, with household telephones (N=2000), was collected 17-19 September, 1991, and had a completed interview rate of 81.8%. The questionnaire replicated items from the California Alameda Study and the US Health Interview Survey. Respondents' urban area of residence was linked to macro measures of inequality derived from the Moscow census. This report describes the baseline survey of a prospective study design. Results of this study demonstrate that the social context in a community affects the health of people living there independently from the effects of individual health lifestyle or social connectivity. The structural conditions in Moscow which significantly increased the vulnerability of specific social groups for poor physical health were identified in a hierarchical linear regression: relative social inequality in the form of income inequality; urban area poverty risks; and mean level of alcohol consumption in urban areas. The psychosocial conditions included poor diet, lack of social cohesion and social support, involvement in formal social networks in the form of professional groups. A multilevel theoretical perspective is important for defining the targets of preventive health policy by identifying the structural conditions which increase the health disadvantage of some social groups. Further research is needed in refining the concept of relative social inequality, as well as investigating whether psychosocial factors, such as social cohesion, are mediating links between sick societies and their sick citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • McKeehan, I. V., 2000. "A multilevel city health profile of Moscow," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 1295-1312, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:9:p:1295-1312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00093-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ferlander, Sara & Mäkinen, Ilkka Henrik, 2009. "Social capital, gender and self-rated health. Evidence from the Moscow Health Survey 2004," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1323-1332, November.
    2. Karen Witten & Daniel Exeter & Adrian Field, 2003. "The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 161-177, January.
    3. Sheaff, Rod, 2005. "Governance in gridlock in the Russian health system; the case of Sverdlovsk oblast," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(10), pages 2359-2369, May.
    4. Galea, Sandro & Ahern, Jennifer & Karpati, Adam, 2005. "A model of underlying socioeconomic vulnerability in human populations: evidence from variability in population health and implications for public health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(11), pages 2417-2430, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:9:p:1295-1312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.