IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i9p1283-1293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework

Author

Listed:
  • Siegrist, Johannes

Abstract

A sociological framework is proposed to better understand how spatial characteristics translate into people's physical and psychosocial conditions that are relevant to their health. In particular, high susceptibility to poor health among specific adult population groups is analyzed in terms of exclusion from or inadequate participation in a society's structure of opportunities. Acquisition of, and agency through, core social roles, such as the work role, the family and marital role, and civic roles, are essential prerequisites for successful personal self-regulation in adult life, strengthening a sense of self-esteem, self-efficacy, and belonging (self-integration). It is argued that exclusion from, or loss of core social roles, threats to their continuity and confinement to non-reciprocal exchange impair personal self-regulation and trigger a state of 'social reward deficiency'. This state, in turn, elicits prolonged stressful experience, and it may reinforce a person's craving for stress-relieving, potentially addictive health-damaging behavior. This framework is applied to the explanation of the life expectancy gap between Western and Central/Eastern European countries. Although most of the epidemiological evidence reviewed in support of this approach originates from investigations that were conducted in western countries several results reported in the collection of articles published in this Special Issue of Social Science and Medicine are in line with the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Siegrist, Johannes, 2000. "Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 1283-1293, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:9:p:1283-1293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00092-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:9:p:1283-1293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.