IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v51y2000i7p1121-1127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification -- too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola

Author

Listed:
  • Rose, D.
  • Pevalin, D. J.

Abstract

Chandola's (2000; Social Science and Medicine, 50(5), 641-649) claims that the UK National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) is not significantly related to mortality are examined. It is shown that this result is likely to be an artefact of the data and methods he uses. Other findings and interpretations in his paper are also critically discussed. In the process, various theoretical, measurement and analysis issues relating to the use of classifications such as the NS-SEC in health research are reviewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose, D. & Pevalin, D. J., 2000. "Social class differences in mortality using the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification -- too little, too soon: a reply to Chandola," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(7), pages 1121-1127, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:7:p:1121-1127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(00)00136-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Ge & Sessions, John G. & Fu, Yu & Wall, Martin, 2015. "A multilevel cross-lagged structural equation analysis for reciprocal relationship between social capital and health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-8.
    2. John Sessions & Ge Yu & Martin Wall, 2011. "Social Capital and Health: A Longitudinal Analysis from the British Household Panel Survey," Department of Economics Working Papers 6/11, University of Bath, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:51:y:2000:i:7:p:1121-1127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.